Reduced plant–soil feedback of plant species expanding their range as compared to natives

By ROY H. A. Van GRUNSVEN, W. H. van der Putten, T. Martijn Bezemer, W. Tamis, F. Berendse, E. Veenendaal. 2007

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/924c7a8977f4e7a088f14014ce2cdaad31e2e7ac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Climate Change, Aboveground-Belowground Interactions, and Species' Range Shifts (2012, background): “Van der Putten”
Plant–soil feedback: experimental approaches, statistical analyses and ecological interpretations (2010, methodology): “The deviation from the neutral feedback expectation is then tested separately per species using t-tests (e.g. Klironomos 2002; Kardol et al. 2007; VanGrunsven et al. 2007).”
Plant–soil interactions in the expansion and native range of a poleward shifting plant species (2010, background): “Less negative plant–soil feedback in range expanding species, compared with native species, has been found for a number of species (van Grunsven et al., 2007; Engelkes et al., 2008).”
Adapt or disperse: understanding species persistence in a changing world (2010, background): “However, passive dispersal of small organisms with a body size o1 mm in length is nonintentional and nondirectional, and this may account for the temporary release of plants from soil pathogenic activity observed by van Grunsven et al. (2007).”
The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. (2008, result): “A similar mechanism was reported by Van Grunsven et al. (2007) for plant species that expand their range because of climate change.”
Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels (2010, background): “…warming and trophic interactions W. H. Van der Putten et al. 2029 may have less negative feedback interactions with the soil community from the new range than related species that are native in that range, which results in an enemy release effect (Van Grunsven et al. 2007; Engelkes et al. 2008).”
Invasive plants escape from suppressive soil biota at regional scales (2014, background): “Range expanding species also appear to suffer from less negative soil feedbacks than do species that have not migrated in response to climate change (Van Grunsven et al. 2007; Engelkes et al. 2008).”
Plant–soil feedback induces shifts in biomass allocation in the invasive plant Chromolaena odorata (2009, methodology): “These hypotheses have not yet been tested in conjunction with release from soil-borne pathogens, although shifts in allocation patterns are known to be triggered by changes in the soil community (D’Hertefeldt & Van der Putten 1998; Bourne et al. 2008).”