An Optimal Control Model of Forest Carbon Sequestration
By B. Sohngen, R. Mendelsohn. 2003
425 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4d90669050144d5ac6fa3ddf46fae26b98d350e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Keywan Riahi
- Pete Smith
- Michael Obersteiner
- Thomas W. Hertel
- J. Minx
- Sheila M. Olmstead
- Sabine Fuss
- Felix Creutzig
In Global and Planetary Change
- Michael Obersteiner
- E. Rametsteiner
- Sabine Fuss
- J. Minx
- Thomas W. Hertel
- W. Lamb
- M. Callaghan
- B. Sohngen
Citations in the corpus
- Geographically explicit global modeling of land-use change, carbon sequestration, and biomass supply (2007, methodology): “[27] and Sohngen and Mendelsohn [29]) have been chosen to compare global and regional estimates for gains of forest area and additional carbon storage with the DIMA model estimates.”
- Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation (2008, positive): “AD could thus provide substantial additional emission reduc- Global Emission Reduction 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 C ar b o n P ri ce [ $ t-1 C O 2] Emission Reduction from AD [Mt CO2 yr-1] Mean GCOMAP DIMA GTM Central and South America 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10”
- Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects (2018, background): “Earlier estimates lie in between 0.47 and 4.88 GtCO2 yr −1 by 2100 (Sohngen and Mendelsohn 2003, Cannell 2002, Canadell and Raupach 2008, Strengers et al 2008, van Minnen et al 2008, Thomson et al 2008) with estimates depending on various assumptions, most notably the amount of land available.”
- Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context (2007, background): “Sectoral studies suggest that some land-based mitigation could be cost-effective compared to some traditional energy related mitigation strategies and could provide a large proportion of total mitigation (Richards and Stokes, 2004; Sohngen and Mendelsohn, 2003; McCarl and Schneider, 2001).”
- The Economic Valuation of Environmental Amenities and Disamenities: Methods and Applications (2009, background): “Carbon sequestration is also an important nonconsumptive use (136).”
- Economic consequences of consideration of permanence, leakage and additionality for soil carbon sequestration projects (2007, background): “Studies such as Adams et al. (1999), McCarl and Schneider (2001), and Sohngen and Mendelsohn (2003) that implicitly include all lands in sequestration programs so that they account for additionality and leakage, and which pay only for permanent sequestration, suggest much higher costs for carbon s”
- The Opportunity Cost of Land Use and the Global Potential for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Agriculture and Forestry (2006, background): “Recent studies also suggest that land-based mitigation could be cost-effective and assume a sizable share of overall mitigation responsibility in optimal abatement (Sohngen and Mendelsohn, 2003) and stabilization policies (Rose et al.”
- Merge: An Integrated Assessment Model for Global Climate Change (2005, background): “For details on these models, see, respectively, Sathaye et al. (2003) and Sohngen and Mendelsohn (2003).”