Geographically explicit global modeling of land-use change, carbon sequestration, and biomass supply

By D. Rokityanskiy, P. Benítez, F. Kraxner, I. Mccallum, Michael Obersteiner, E. Rametsteiner, Y. Yamagata. 2007

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Impacts of incentives to reduce emissions from deforestation on global species extinctions (2012, methodology): “Benítez-Ponce P, Mc Callum I, Obersteiner M, Yamagata Y (2004) Global supply for carbon sequestration: identifying least-cost afforestation sites under country risk considerations (IIASA Interim Report) (IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria).”
The Opportunity Cost of Land Use and the Global Potential for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Agriculture and Forestry (2006, background): “Economic studies of the global supply of forest carbon sequestration have evolved and become relatively mature, with globally consistent dynamic frameworks modeling endogenous movement of land into and out of forestry, explicitly considering multiple forest management alternatives and forest types, ”
Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation (2008, methodology): “AD could thus provide substantial additional emission reduc- Global Emission Reduction 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 C ar b o n P ri ce [ $ t-1 C O 2] Emission Reduction from AD [Mt CO2 yr-1] Mean GCOMAP DIMA GTM Central and South America 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10”