Economic consequences of consideration of permanence, leakage and additionality for soil carbon sequestration projects

By B. Murray, B. Sohngen, Martin T. Ross. 2007

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico’s National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program (2012, background): “Murray, Brian C., Bruce A. McCarl, and Heng-Chi Lee.”
Can macroalgae contribute to blue carbon? An Australian perspective (2015, unknown): “We recommend Murray et al. (2007) for more information on leakage.”
Payment for Ecosystem Services from Forests (2014, background): “This literature suggests significant cross-border leakage from forest conservation (Murray et al. 2004, 2007; Gan & McCarl 2007; Meyfroidt & Lambin 2009).6 Almost no papers empirically measure substitution slippage resulting from forest PES.”
Payments for Environmental Services: Evolution Toward Efficient and Fair Incentives for Multifunctional Landscapes (2012, background): “The nature of both the quid and the quo is often not as clear as it appears to be, with additionality, leakage, and permanence concerns (31, 32) that straddle temporal and spatial scales and require complementary types of economic analysis.”