Merge: An Integrated Assessment Model for Global Climate Change

By A. Manne, Richard G. Richels. 2005

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dba77820af9569f7bd74fd8c88d6f9bee0b9a231

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Ottmar Edenhofer
2. Richard S. J. Tol
3. K. Lessmann
4. E. A. Stanton
5. C. Brink
6. Marian Leimbach
7. B. Magné
8. J. Bollen

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. C. Brink
2. Richard S. J. Tol
3. E. A. Stanton
4. H. Eerens
5. J. Bollen
6. Bob van der Zwaan

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Richard S. J. Tol
2. E. A. Stanton
3. D. V. van Vuuren
4. C. Brink
5. B. Magné
6. Ottmar Edenhofer
7. Socrates Kypreos
8. K. Lessmann

Citations in the corpus

• Negishi welfare weights in integrated assessment models: the mathematics of global inequality (2011, background): “2006), FUND (Tol 1999), MERGE (Manne and Richels 2004), CETA-M (Peck and Teisberg 1999), GRAPE (Kurosawa 2004), and AIM/Dynamic Global (Masui et al.”
• A Meta-Analysis of the Total Economic Impact of Climate Change (2022, background): “Ackerman and Stanton (2012), Bosetti et al. (2007), Gunasekera et al. (2008), Manne and Richels (2005), Tol (2013), Weitzman (2012) do not present new estimates of the total impact of climate change, focus instead on the social cost of carbon.”
• Local air pollution and global climate change. A combined cost-benefit analysis. (2009, methodology): “The original MERGE model has been modified, as described in Manne and Richels (1995, 2003, 2004) , by adding the link that already exists between GCC and LAP through energy production, thus obtaining a model that can simulate the costs and benefits from both GCC”
• The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs (2010, methodology): “MERGE represents a modified version of MERGE5 described by Kypreos and Bahn (2003) and Manne and Richels (2004a; 2004b).”
• The use of scenarios as the basis for combined assessment of climate change mitigation and adaptation (2011, unknown): “The most integrated analyses to date come from the cost–benefit oriented integrated assessment models like FUND, DICE and MERGE (Manne and Richels, 2005; Nordhaus, 2008; Tol, 2002c) – but these models typically aggregated climate impacts into a limited amount of rather abstract damage functions.”
• Fossil fuel depletion and socio-economic scenarios: An integrated approach (2014, unknown): “…models, most focusing on climate change analysis, have been developed (e.g. MESSAGE (Nakicenovic and Riahi, 2003), IMAGE (Bouwman et al., 2006), MERGE (Manne and Richels, 2004), etc.), some based on system dynamics (Bassi and Shilling, 2010; Davies and Simonovic, 2010; Fiddaman, 2002).”