Some talk: Money in politics. A (partial) review of the literature

By Thomas Stratmann. 2005

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b493ede8565adf2c948e4b69f5a303bb3bc264eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Gender Studies

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Corporate Political Contributions and Stock Returns (2010, background): “…and the contributing firm (as measured by the length of the firm-candidate relationship), the ability of the candidates to help the firm (as measured by the home state of the firm and the candidate), and the power of the candidates (as 2 Stratmann (2005) provides a survey of the related literature.”
Politically Connected Boards of Directors and the Allocation of Procurement Contracts (2013, background): “7 Stratmann (2005) provides a summary of the literature on donations.”
Individual Political Contributions and Firm Performance (2012, background): “…therefore face a $2,000 limit for the majority of our sample period) rather than indirectly supporting the politician through a special 5 Ansolabehere, et al. (2003) and Stratmann (2005) are excellent reviews. interest PAC or through a party committee (where they face a $5,000 or a $20,000 limit).”
The Implications of Unverifiable Fair-Value Accounting: Evidence from the Political Economy of Goodwill Accounting (2008, background): “SEC Chief Accountant Lynn Turner (1999) noted that he often saw pooling transactions that “clearly [did] not meet the spirit or the intention of [APB 16].”
Revolving door lobbyists (2012, background): “§Department of Economics and Business, UPF and Centre for Economic Performance, LSE; Email: christian.fonsrosen@upf.edu 1”
Elections and Discretionary Accruals: Evidence from 2004 (2010, unknown): “Kroszner, R. and T. Stratmann 2005.”
The Effect of Bureaucratic Responsiveness on Citizen Participation (2017, background): “It must be noted that these studies are not an ideal test of objective efficacy, as closeness of the race is also strongly associated with greater party mobilization, salience in the media, and political interest (Cox and Munger 1989; Fauvelle-Aymar and François 2006; Stratmann 2005).”