The diet of deepwater sharks and the benefits of using DNA identification of prey

By M. Dunn, A. Szabo, M. McVeagh, Peter J. S. Smith. 2010

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/282b7f1ba1d9c3cbe220dca0806709c735556a8c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. S. Green
2. Isabelle M. Côté
3. A. Buckland
4. J. Morris
5. R. Baker
6. Marcus Sheaves
7. N. Loneragan
8. J. L. Akins

In Molecular Biology

1. S. Green
2. J. Morris
3. D. Steinke
4. Isabelle M. Côté

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. A. Buckland
2. Marcus Sheaves
3. R. Baker
4. N. Loneragan
5. J. Morris
6. D. Steinke
7. Isabelle M. Côté
8. J. L. Akins

Citations in the corpus

• Standardising fish stomach content analysis: The importance of prey condition (2017, methodology): “However, DNA analysis is more commonly applied to megafauna research (e.g. Dunn et al., 2010), where smaller sample sizes and a correlation between prey types and existing molecular databases presumably make this resource intensive tool more accessible (Symondson, 2002).”
• Diet richness of invasive Indo-Pacific lionfish revealed by DNA barcoding (2013, background): “…has been successfully used to identify dietary items of species that are challenging to study owing to their rarity (e.g. deepwater sharks; Dunn et al. 2010), small body size (e.g. larval fish; Victor et al. 2009, Riemann et al. 2010), or species-rich generalist diets (e.g. coral reef…”