Organisational Learning and Governance Through Embedded Practices
By A. Amin, Patrick S. Cohendet. 2000
166 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b424f7e8a4ccf7b6322ab1e39ee7f2adab7d93a1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Donald S. Siegel
- M. Gertler
- Colin Mcfarlane
- P. Maskell
- Erkko Autio
- Mike Wright
- Philippe Mustar
- Ron A. Boschma
In Strategy and Management
- Ron A. Boschma
- Mike Wright
- A. Rodríguez‐Pose
- Pierre-Alexandre Balland
- P. Maskell
- E. Malecki
- Donald S. Siegel
- H. Bathelt
Citations in the corpus
- Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) (2003, background): “Thus, according to this approach, organizational or relational proximity and occupational similarity are more important than geographical proximity in supporting the production, identification, appropriation and flow of tacit knowledge (Amin, 2000; Amin and Cohendet, 1999; 2000).”
- The Firm in Economic Geography* (2001, background): “Amin and Cohendet (1999, 2000) have moved far in the direction suggested here by confronting and reconciling different theories of the firm to build a coherent platform for their broader investigation.”
- Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development (2008, background): “tacit and explicit knowledge can be misleading because there are interrelationships between them (Amin and Cohendet, 2000).”
- Towards a Better Conceptual Framework for Innovation Processes in Agriculture and Rural Development: From Linear Models to Systemic Approaches (2009, background): “Evolutionary economists look at the knowledge created in firms, which can be perceived as knowledge processing entities (Amin and Condehet, 2000) and look to common frames, routines, lifeworlds as the specific genetic endowment that allows firms’ specific evolutionary patterns (Nelson and Winter,…”
- Scientific Knowledge Dynamics and Relatedness in Bio-Tech Cities (2014, background): “Therefore, interaction between agents is central, and knowledge production is more than ever an outcome of socially constructed learning processes (Amin and Cohendet, 2000).”
- The theoretical and policy implications of knowledge codification (2001, background): “…implies that there are two main governance mechanisms to be considered by the firm: the mechanism for governing competencies, defined by the need to co-ordinate knowledge, and the mechanism for governing transactions, reliant on the need to manage transactions (see also Amin and Cohendet, 2000).”
- The Evolution of Technologies in Time and Space: From National and Regional to Spatial Innovation Systems (2002, background): “This is evident in the five competencies that Amin and Cohendet (1999) suggested are now critical for globalized firms: (1) integrate the firm internally, (2) exploit advantages of proximity at many locations, (3) integrate fragmented pieces of localized learning, (4) invest continually in access…”
- Knowledge, learning and development: a post-rationalist approach (2006, background): “Both forms are complementary and essential in knowledge creation (Nonaka et al., 2000: 8; Amin and Cohendet, 1999, 2000, 2004).”
- Human geography and the institutions that underlie economic growth (2011, background): “Other geographers have shifted away from a focus of territorialized knowledge spillovers to explore how relational proximity shapes learning across different geographical scales, for example through communities of practice (Amin and Cohendet, 2000).”
- Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context (2014, background): “Evolutionary scholars have shown that knowledge is widely dispersed among many heterogeneous agents and that the interactions and exchanges between them are crucial for new knowledge production (Amin and Cohendet, 2000), and hence entrepreneurial innovation.”