The Evolution of Technologies in Time and Space: From National and Regional to Spatial Innovation Systems

By P. Oinas, E. Malecki. 2002

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c5e95aa62cf0edb27488d1b64097643b6e2dca7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

An Innovative Region in China: Interaction Between Multinational Corporations and Local Firms in a High-Tech Cluster in Beijing (2003, background): “Scholars have recently called for more consideration to be given to extra-local connections in technological changes even in advanced countries (Bunnell and Coe 2002; Oinas and Malecki 2002).”
Moving innovation systems research to the next level: towards an integrative agenda (2017, unknown): “When boundaries are chosen, an explicit analysis of which sort of forces and factors are relegated to the ‘context’ of the system would equally be important (Oinas and Malecki, 2002; Fromhold-Eisebith, 2007; Bergek et al., 2015).”
Path Creation as a Process of Resource Alignment and Anchoring: Industry Formation for On-Site Water Recycling in Beijing (2016, background): “In particular the coupling between (spatially extensive) technologyspecific actor networks and institutions and the actors embedded in a given regional innovation system are key to understanding how and where new industries form (Oinas and Malecki 2002).”
Developing Biotechnology Clusters in Non‐high Technology Regions—The Case of Austria (2007, background): “On the one hand, these extra‐local ties comprise the relationships of regional firms to distant companies and knowledge organizations that provide access to ideas, expertise and technologies, which are not available at the regional scale (Camagni, 1991 ; Bunnel and Coe, 2001 ; Oinas and Malecki, ”
Growth, development, and innovation: A look backward and forward (2003, background): “The framework of spatial innovation systems focuses on the combination of local and distant connections ( Oinas and Malecki 2002; Bunnell and Coe 2001).”
The Internationalization of Corporate R&D and the Automotive Industry R&D of East-Central Europe (2012, background): “Where such R&D assets have been developed, the potential for the growth of R&D is higher (Coe et al. 2004; Oinas and Malecki 2002; Martin and Sunley 2006; Martin 2010).”
Connecting local entrepreneurial ecosystems to global innovation networks: open innovation, double networks and knowledge integration (2011, background): “Actually, there is not a coordinated or organised global system, but rather a collection of spatial innovations systems (Oinas and Malecki, 2002).”
Transformation of regional innovation systems : from old legacies to new development paths (2012, background): “The importance of interregional and international innovation networks and the capacity of RISs to get access to and absorb knowledge from extra-regional sources in order to avoid “entropic death” and parochial lock-in are widely acknowledged in the literature (Camagni 1991, Oinas and Malecki 2002).”
Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues (2009, methodology): “Maggioni 2002) and internet flows (e.g. Oinas and Malecki 2002 ).”
One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach (2005, background): “External links provide access to ideas, knowledge and technologies, which are not generated within the limited context of the region (Camagni 1991, Oinas and Malecki 1999, 2002, Mytelka 2000, Bunnel and Coe 2001).”