Human geography and the institutions that underlie economic growth

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Separate Worlds? Explaining the current wave of regional economic polarization (2018, background): “…Worlds Rodriguez-Pose (2013), echoing an important current in contemporary social science, argues that there is a widespread consensus that “institutions are important to development” (Acemoglu et al 2004; Acemoglu and Robinson, 2012; Rodrik, Subramanian and Trebbi, 2004; Farole et al, 2010).”
Why do regions develop and change?: the challenge for geography and economics (2011, background): “Geographers have also actively explored institutionalist approaches to the origins of agglomerations, the spatial sorting of economic activity, and the matching of regions to activities (Farole et al., 2010).”
Institutional Thickness Revisited (2017, background): “However, the authors admit that, regardless of endogeneity issues, it is still worth analyzing how, when, and which institutions influence different social phenomena in order to gain a better understanding of their development (Farole, Rodríguez-Pose, and Storper 2011).”
Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation (2017, unknown): “While the vast corpus of this institutional literature is devoted to national level debates (Rodrik, 2003, North, 2005; Acemoglu and Robinson, 2012), there is growing interest in the sub-national level (Gertler, 2010; Farole et al, 2011; Mackinnon et al, 2009; Rodriguez-Pose, 2013; Tomaney, 2013).”