Minimising Payment Vehicle Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Do protest responses to a contingent valuation question and a choice experiment differ? (2008, background): “Possible reasons are dissension with specific aspects of the CV study such as the payment vehicle ( Morrison et al. 2000 ), ethical beliefs indicated, for example, by lexicographic preferences (Soderquist 1998 )o r fairness aspects (Jorgensen et al. 2001).”
Valuing New South Wales rivers for use in benefit transfer (2004, background): “Payment scenarios are important in all stated preference applications as they specify the method and timing of payment, both of which have been demonstrated to affect value estimates (Stevens et al . 1994; Morrison et al . 2000 ).”
Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods (2009, background): “In line with Morrison et al. (2000) , protest zero bidders and irrational bidders are removed from the initial samples to yield the effective samples used in the parametric modelling of preferences in Sect.”
Attending to the Reasons for Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments (2011, background): “All choices from respondents identified as protesters are typically excluded from the analysis (Morrison et al. 2000).”