BIND--The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database.

By Gary D. Bader, Doron Betel, Christopher W. V. Hogue. Nucleic Acids Research, 2001

620 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b37d1e07de30b7061be39f766fec1dd8c73de7be

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry (2002, methodology): “Interaction data sets were entered into the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database (BIND)—a standardized repository for all forms of biological interaction data, including protein–protein interaction”
Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks (2002, unknown): “To construct a large molecular interaction network for yeast, we included all 7145 protein–protein interactions in the BIND database (Bader et al., 2001) and all 317 protein→DNA interactions present in TRANSFAC (Wingender et al., 2001) as of September 2001.”
The MIPS mammalian protein?Cprotein interaction database (2005, background): “Despite its practical relevance, comparatively little PPI data from mammals has been available in public databases like BIND (Bader et al., 2003), DIP (Salwinski et al.”
Biological network comparison using graphlet degree distribution (2007, unknown): “Note that these PPI networks come from of a wide array of experimental techniques; for example, YHC and Y11K are mainly coming from tandem affinity purifications (TAP) and high throughput MS/MS protein complex identification (HMS-PCI), while YIC, YU, YICU,FE, FH, WE, WH, HS, and HG are yeast two-hyb”
BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database (2003, background): “1 data specification [as previously published (4,5)] that can describe much of the detail underlying biochemical and genetic networks.”
Data Mining Techniques for the Life Sciences (2010, methodology): “RNAdb and NONCODE manually collect GenBank entries that correspond to noncoding RNAs.”
Foundations of Modern Query Languages for Graph Databases (2016, methodology): “ometimes paths alone are not enough,and we are interested in repetitionsof graph patterns inside the graph, giving rise to graph motifs which are are often used in biological networks [Schaefer 2004; Bader et al. 2003] to discover metabolic pathways or patterns that are often repeated [Leser 2005]. ”
Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome (2007, unknown): “Large protein–protein interaction databases (such as BIN”
Kernel methods for predicting protein-protein interactions (2005, unknown): “In this work, we focus on the latter task, and use interactions that are derived from theBINDdatabase (Bader et al., 2001), which makes a distinction between experimental results that yield comembership in a complex and interactions that are more likely to be direct ones.”
Protein networks in disease. (2008, methodology): “2007), and BIND (Bader et al. 2003).”