The MIPS mammalian protein?Cprotein interaction database

By P. Pagel, Stefan Kovac, Matthias Oesterheld, Barbara Brauner, I. Dunger, Goar Frishman, Corinna Montrone, Pekka Mark, V. Stümpflen, Hans-Werner Mewes and 2 more. Bioinform., 2005

555 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed1c690c2c8122ea247c1bdeecf08bf5f376c514

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

In Spectroscopy

Citations in the corpus

MPact: the MIPS protein interaction resource on yeast (2005, methodology): “This approach was chosen to fulﬁll different requirements of diverse protein interaction projects at MIPS like the MPPI resource (15).”
Integrative Annotation of Variants from 1092 Humans: Application to Cancer Genomics (2013, methodology): “2 Structural Interaction network (SIN) construction and analysis to find SNPs at interaction interfaces For SIN construction, PPI network is curated and filtered from HPRD (Human Protein Reference Database) and MIPS database, containing 39,849 interactions between 7,432 proteins (71).”
A protein-protein interaction network for human inherited ataxias and disorders of Purkinje cell degeneration. (2006, background): “…public databases, including BIND (Bader et al., 2003), DIP (Xenarios et al., 2002), HPRD (Peri et al., 2003), MINT (Zanzoni et al., 2002), and MIPS (Pagel et al., 2005), to identify literature-based binary interactions involving the 54 ataxia-associated baits and the 561 interacting prey proteins.”
Literature-curated protein interaction datasets (2009, methodology): “…~7,000 × 7,000 genes for a first-draft human interactome mapping project 31 corresponding to pairs reported two or more times (two different PubMed identifiers) and curated in two or more databases (the five databases used were HPRD 22 , BIND 41 , MINT 19 , MIPS mammalian database 16 and DIP 18 ).”
Inference of patient-specific pathway activities from multi-dimensional cancer genomics data using PARADIGM (2010, methodology): “Other approaches include using a hypergeometric testbased method to identify Gene Ontology (Ashburner et al., 2000) or MIPS mammalian protein–protein interaction (Pagel et al., 2005) categories enriched in differentially expressed genes (Tamayo et al., 1999).”