The Principalship: How Significant Is Mentoring?.

By B. Hansford, L. Ehrich. 2006

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Purpose – To draw on a structured review of the literature on formalised mentoring programs for principals with the purpose of exploring their nature and the positive and negative outcomes for the parties involved.Design/methodology/approach – The methodological approach utilised in this paper was a structured review of the literature which is a pre‐determined set of criteria, namely a set of coding categories, used for analysing research papers. Forty research‐based papers constituted the structured review and major coding categories utilised in this paper were positive and negative outcomes of mentoring programs for mentors and mentees and factual data relating to the research focus of the sample.Findings – Both positive and negative outcomes of mentoring were reported in the 40 research‐based papers, with substantially more papers reporting positive outcomes. Frequently cited positive outcomes for mentees included support, sharing ideas and professional development, while, for mentors, networking, prof...

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3762b5ab164f68a104d5db1f3bd53fba546aa56

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. Alison J. Smith

In Clinical Psychology

  1. Alison J. Smith
  2. Heather E. Duncan
  3. Mark J. Stock

In Social Psychology

  1. Heather E. Duncan
  2. Mark J. Stock
  3. Alison J. Smith

Citations in the corpus