Cognition and Communication: Judgmental Biases, Research Methods, and the Logic of Conversation
By Norbert Schwarz. 2014
204 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b36154d1a05e9ff296a36c97d8858d73a54ba4d1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- D. Oyserman
- Adam J. L. Harris
- Ulrike Hahn
- Norbert Schwarz
- Jason Reifler
- Brendan Nyhan
- Gregory Walton
- Mahzarin R. Banaji
Citations in the corpus
- Identity‐Based Motivation: Implications for Health and Health Disparities (2014, background): “Students were either led to believe that their experience (of physical activity as important or impossible) was more frequent or less frequent than others (following Schwarz, 1996).”
- What Does It Mean to be Biased: Motivated Reasoning and Rationality (2014, background): “…human irrationality that their results depend on systematic (and misleading) violations of participant expectations and that when discrepancies are reduced, so are the deviations from normative, rational responding (see e.g., Hilton, 1996; Schwarz, 1996 for discussion and specific examples).”
- The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics (2017, background): “Such a response is not unreasonable given that the survey researcher has suggested by the construction of the question that the issue or claim in question is legitimate (Schwarz, 2014, p. 35).”
- Why researchers should think "real-time": A cognitive rationale. (2012, background): “Their use of this information is licensed by the tacit assumptions that govern the conduct of conversation in daily life (Grice, 1975), which respondents bring to the research situation (for reviews see Schwarz, 1994, 1996).”