Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation

By Thomas A. Schwandt, Yvonna S. Lincoln, E. Guba. 2007

4,135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c1358087efb43bdf94cb598bb635344d8e60c34

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In History and Philosophy of Science

In Philosophy

Citations in the corpus

Application of four-dimension criteria to assess rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine (2018, methodology): “Table 1 Key FDC strategies adapted from Lincoln and Guba [23]”
The Wisdom Development Scale: Translating the Conceptual to the Concrete (2006, methodology): “Additionally, a separate inquiry auditor ensured that grounded theory procedures were followed properly (Lincoln & Guba, 1986).”
Exploring the Function of Member Checking (2019, methodology): “…Methodology, Member Checking Member checking is an integral part of creating trustworthiness in qualitative research (Creswell & Miller, 2000; Lincoln & Guba, 1986; Stake, 1995); despite its ubiquity, there is very little written about member checking outside of it being an item to be…”
Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research (2019, background): “Many qualitative researchers reject validity and reliability altogether in favor of concepts like dependability, confirmability, credibility, and transferability that resonate with interpretivist accounts [41,62].”
Delineating the Ways That Key Institutional Agents Provide Racial Minority Students With Access to Social Capital in College (2012, methodology): “Several additional methods prescribed by Lincoln and Guba (1986) were utilized to maximize trustworthiness of the findings.”
Seeking Support: Transgender Client Experiences with Mental Health Services (2013, methodology): “Trustworthiness parallels criteria for rigorous research methods, ensuring reliability and validity of the data (Lincoln & Guba, 1986).”
Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies (2021, methodology): “To satisfy these criteria, the analysis employed several recommended strategies (Lincoln and Guba 1986).”
The Role of Ethnic Student Organizations in Fostering African American and Asian American Students' Cultural Adjustment and Membership at Predominantly White Institutions (2008, methodology): “Trustworthiness of the findings emerging from this examination was ensured using several methods suggested by Lincoln and Guba (1986).”
Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: myths and strategies. (2010, background): “Yet, even Lincoln and Guba (1986) acknowledged that ‘‘it is by no means clear how ‘thick’ a thick description needs to be’’ (p. 77).”
The Continuing Significance of Racism in the Lives of Asian American College Students (2015, methodology): “Trustworthiness of the findings emerging from this examination was strengthened using several methods suggested by Lincoln and Guba (1986).”
Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. (2005, positive): “Building on trustworthiness and authenticity criteria suggested by Lincoln and Guba (1986), Patton (2002) also identified dependability ( " a systematic process systematically followed, " p. 546) and triangulation ( " capturing and respecting multiple perspectives, " p. 546) as important components…”
Evaluating Qualitative Research for Social Work Practitioners (2010, background): “Padgett (2008) defines triangulation as a concept adapted from navigational science involving the use of “two or more sources to achieve a comprehensive picture of a fixed point of reference” (p.”