Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed.

By J. D. Creswell. 2018

3,705 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b35381ce412e44d8d01e7d326bbf474225a121d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Understanding memorable tourism experiences and behavioural intentions of heritage tourists (2021, methodology): “This variant is particularly useful as all data strands are used in tandem to gain a deeper understanding of a phenomenon (Creswell & Clark, 2018).”
Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019, background): “performance, service behaviors) to demonstrate if servant leadership can be learnt and then implemented for the benefit of employees and the organization (see Day, 2000 for a review of leadership development measurement tools). Taking this further, researchers might examine how servant leaders creat”
L2 motivational self system and willingness to communicate in the classroom and extramural digital contexts (2021, unknown): “To elaborate on the quantitative findings, we took the following eight steps in light of Creswell and Clark (2018) guideline for mixed methods research: First, the second author conducted follow-up inter-views with those (see Table 4) who had completed the survey and agreed to take part in the…”
Gamification in mobile-assisted language learning: a systematic review of Duolingo literature from public release of 2012 to early 2020 (2021, background): “Non-probability samples raise questions regarding sampling bias and margins of error (Vehovar, Toepoel, & Steinmetz, 2016) and biases in favor of students already enrolled in language-learning classes or people already pursuing language learning (Creswell & Clark, 2018).”