Methods of evaluating electric vehicles from a user's perspective - The MINI E field trial in Berlin

By P. Cocron, F. Buehler, I. Neumann, Thomas Franke, Josef F. Krems, M. Schwalm, Andreas Keinath. 2011

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b286a11ade3bad2c4e7bdb2a7ed948594b6adaef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Thomas Franke
2. Josef F. Krems

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. John Axsen
2. Josef F. Krems
3. Thomas Franke
4. Kenneth S. Kurani
5. J. Bailey
6. Benjamin Sovacool
7. Marisol Castro
8. Nicolette D. Caperello

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Thomas Franke
2. Josef F. Krems
3. John Axsen

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding charging behaviour of electric vehicle users (2013, methodology): “Additional details on the field trial methodology are reported in other publications (Cocron et al., 2011; Franke, Bühler, et al., 2012).”
• Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid, or Electric - What Do Car Buyers Want? (2013, background): “Since these early studies, ongoing empirical observation show that sufficiently motivated households can adapt their lifestyles to new, limited-range vehicle technologies (Cocron et al., 2011; Pierre et al., 2011; Turrentine et al., 2011; Woodjack et al., 2012).”
• What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users (2013, methodology): “methodology are reported elsewhere (Cocron et al., 2011; Franke et al., 2012a).”
• Interacting with limited mobility resources: Psychological range levels in electric vehicle use (2013, background): “Further details on the field trial methodology are reported elsewhere (Cocron et al., 2011; Franke et al., 2012a).”