Nucleation processes in deep convection simulated by a cloud-system-resolving model with double-moment bulk microphysics

By V. Phillips, Leo Donner, S. Garner. 2007

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2344069ff2edfa9b39e35f531c3afb952f1cedc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests (2008, background): “2005; Morrison and Grabowski 2007; Phillips et al. 2007).”
Sensitivity studies of different aerosol indirect effects in mixed-phase clouds (2009, background): “We also investigate the contribution of thermophoresis to contact freezing, which could be of importance in subsaturated cloudy regions where the temperature gradient would favor collisions between a contact IN and an evaporating cloud droplet as evaluated by Phillips et al.(2007).”
Improvements to an Empirical Parameterization of Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation and Its Comparison with Observations (2013, background): “Contact freezing is predicted to be less prolific than other modes of IN activity in mesoscale systems consisting both of convective and stratiform clouds, whether outside in (Phillips et al. 2007) or inside out.”
Aerosol- and updraft-limited regimes of cloud droplet formation: influence of particle number, size and hygroscopicity on the activation of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) (2009, methodology): “3), we have used νs=2 and the parameterization of Pitzer and Mayorga (1973) for 8s (OS1 model of Rose et al.”
Parameterization of Cloud Microphysics Based on the Prediction of Bulk Ice Particle Properties. Part I: Scheme Description and Idealized Tests (2015, background): “While individual drops do not undergo spontaneous breakup until they reach rather large sizes (;5mm) (Pruppacher and Klett 1997), it should be kept in mind that a fraction of drops will reach sizes that undergo spontaneous breakup when Dmr is smaller because the drop distribution is polydisperse,…”
Sensitivity of a Simulated Squall Line to Horizontal Resolution and Parameterization of Microphysics (2012, unknown): “…schemes have also been widely used to treat droplet activation and cloud–aerosol interaction via prediction of the droplet number concentration (e.g., Ghan et al. 1997; Cohard and Pinty 2000; Morrison et al. 2005, hereafter M05; Seifert and Beheng 2006a,b; Phillips et al. 2007; Ming et al. 2007).”
Secondary Ice Production: Current State of the Science and Recommendations for the Future (2016, unknown): “…Mason 1996; Blyth and Latham 1997; Ovtchinnikov and Kogan 2000; Phillips et al. 2001; Clark et al. 2005; Connolly et al. 2006b; Fridlind et al. 2007; Phillips et al. 2007; Huang et al. 2008; Crawford et al. 2012 Phillips et al. 2001; Connolly et al. 2006b; Huang et al. 2008, 2011 The terms ‘‘rime…”
The dependence of aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation on cloud‐system organization, shear and stability (2008, methodology): “However, recent studies by van den Heever et al. [2006], Khain et al.”
The Non-hydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model: description and development (2014, methodology): “…et al. 2008; Tomita 2008b), and the double-moment bulk method predicts the number concentration in addition to the mass concentration (Meyers et al. 1997; Feingold et al. 1998; Morrison et al. 2005; Seifert and Beheng 2006; Phillips et al. 2007; Morrison and Gettelman 2008; Lim and Hong 2010).”
How important is biological ice nucleation in clouds on a global scale? (2010, background): “According to cloud model calculations, condensation/immersion freezing accounts for the major part of heterogeneous ice nucleation in mixedphase clouds (Meyers et al 1992, Phillips et al 2007).”
Representation of microphysical processes in cloud‐resolving models: Spectral (bin) microphysics versus bulk parameterization (2015, methodology): “There are SBM schemes wherein detailed melting is included by tracing the history of liquid water within melting particles and the advection of liquid water mass within ice particles [Phillips et al., 2007b].”
Modeling Supersaturation and Subgrid-Scale Mixing with Two-Moment Bulk Warm Microphysics (2008, background): “Some schemes use a hybrid approach whereby droplet activation at cloud base is diagnostic, while activation in the cloud interior (e.g., due to strongly increasing updraft strength in deep convection) is based on the predicted supersaturation (e.g., Phillips et al. 2007).”
Development of an Effective Double-Moment Cloud Microphysics Scheme with Prognostic Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN) for Weather and Climate Models (2010, background): “…clouds even though the strength of these double-moment schemes relies on the accuracy of the representation of several microphysical processes (Cohard and Pinty 2000b; Lee et al. 2004; Thompson et al. 2004; Milbrandt and Yau 2005; Phillips et al. 2007; Luo et al. 2008; Morrison et al. 2009).”