Parameterization of Cloud Microphysics Based on the Prediction of Bulk Ice Particle Properties. Part I: Scheme Description and Idealized Tests

518 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cloud‐resolving model intercomparison of an MC3E squall line case: Part I—Convective updrafts (2017, methodology): “…et al. [1988] to calculate cold pool intensity C, which has been widely used in recent studies [Bryan and Morrison, 2012; Morrison et al., 2012; Morrison and Milbrandt, 2015], C2 ¼ 2 ∫H0Bdz (3) where z is height; B is buoyancy that includes contributions from temperature, vapor, and…”
Confronting the Challenge of Modeling Cloud and Precipitation Microphysics (2020, methodology): “…such as particle aspect ratio, rime mass fraction, liquid fraction, and density without using predefined ice categories (Cholette et al., 2019; Harrington et al., 2013; Jensen et al., 2017; Lin & Colle, 2011; Milbrandt & Morrison, 2016; Morrison & Grabowski, 2008; Morrison & Milbrandt, 2015).”