Development of an Effective Double-Moment Cloud Microphysics Scheme with Prognostic Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN) for Weather and Climate Models

843 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Non-hydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model: description and development (2014, methodology): “…et al. 2008; Tomita 2008b), and the double-moment bulk method predicts the number concentration in addition to the mass concentration (Meyers et al. 1997; Feingold et al. 1998; Morrison et al. 2005; Seifert and Beheng 2006; Phillips et al. 2007; Morrison and Gettelman 2008; Lim and Hong 2010).”
A new high‐resolution Meteorological Reanalysis Italian Dataset: MERIDA (2019, methodology): “…Model for GCMs (RRTMG) scheme for radiation (Iacono et al., 2008), a Grell and Dévényi cumulus scheme (Grell and Dévényi, 2002), WRF single-moment 5-class (WSM5) microphysics (Lim and Hong, 2010) and National Centers for Environmental Prediction NCEP/Noah as land surface scheme (Ek et al., 2003).”
Evaluation of the WRF Double-Moment 6-Class Microphysics Scheme for Precipitating Convection (2010, methodology): “Further details on the CCN activation process are described in appendix A of Lim and Hong [21].”
Representation of microphysical processes in cloud‐resolving models: Spectral (bin) microphysics versus bulk parameterization (2015, background): “266 calculation of production and transport of aerosols [e.g., Lim and Hong, 2010; Thompson and Eidhammer, 2014; Lang et al., 2014].”