A time course analysis of the affective priming effect

By Dirk Hermans, J. de Houwer, P. Eelen. 2001

353 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The argument that automatic processes are responsible for affective/evaluative priming effects has been primarily based on studies that have manipulated the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA; i.e., the interval between the onset of the prime and the onset of the target). Moreover, these SOA studies provide an insight in the time course of the activation processes underlying automatic affect/attitude activation. Based on a fine-grained manipulation of the SOA employing either the evaluative decision task (Experiment 1) and the pronunciation task (Experiment 2) we concluded that affective priming, and hence automatic affect activation, is based on fast-acting automatic processes. The results of Experiment 3 provide a valid explanation for an apparent discrepancy between the results of Experiments 1 and 2 and previous findings. Finally, the results of Experiment 3 support the prediction of Jarvis and Petty (1996) that affective priming effects should be stronger for participants who are more chronically engaged in conscious evaluations.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b22a6438b9c8bdf928822f2b2462220661e7795d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. R. Fazio
  2. Agnes Moors
  3. J. de Houwer
  4. Manuel Perea
  5. Colin J. Davis
  6. Dirk Wentura
  7. Brian K. Payne
  8. O. Govorun

In Social Psychology

  1. Bertram Gawronski
  2. J. de Houwer
  3. Brian K. Payne
  4. Agnes Moors
  5. Malte Friese
  6. Wilhelm Hofmann
  7. O. Govorun
  8. R. Fazio

Citations in the corpus