A comparison of three methods to survey saproxylic beetles in hollow oaks

By T. Ranius, Nicklas Jansson. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2002

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1f0794fe8514a75a059bcfdf793baf0eaec5598

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. B. Jonsson
2. Nicholas Kruys
3. J. Kouki
4. P. Martikainen
5. T. Ranius
6. G. Möller
7. S. Winter
8. E. Hyvärinen

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Kouki
2. B. Jonsson
3. Nicholas Kruys
4. P. Martikainen
5. T. Ranius
6. S. Winter
7. G. Möller
8. Joakim Hjältén

In Insect Science

1. B. Jonsson
2. J. Kouki
3. Nicholas Kruys
4. T. Ranius
5. P. Martikainen
6. S. Winter
7. G. Möller
8. Joakim Hjältén

Citations in the corpus

• Ecology of Species Living on Dead Wood - Lessons for Dead Wood Management (2005, methodology): “The insect fauna on dead wood is often surveyed by window traps (for methods see Kaila 1993, Økland 1996, Ranius and Jansson 2002, Martikainen and Kouki 2003), which may be problematic, as it cannot be ascertained if the collected insects actually use the dead wood substrate.”
• Osmoderma eremita as an indicator of species richness of beetles in tree hollows (2002, background): “Small species are mainly found as living specimens and are underestimated with this method (Ranius and Jansson 2002).”
• Sampling the rarest: threatened beetles in boreal forest biodiversity inventories (2003, result): “However, these methods may give good results when used in surveying threatened beetles in tree cavities (Ranius and Jansson 2002).”
• Microhabitats in lowland beech forests as monitoring tool for nature conservation (2008, background): “5 m, a window trap in the canopy (Ranius and Jansson, 2002) and a lime strip (10 cm wide and 2 m long, closely attached to the bark at 1.”
• Sampling saproxylic beetle assemblages in dead wood logs: comparing window and eclector traps to traditional bark sieving and a refinement (2007, methodology): “Many methods have been used to study saproxylic beetles, but surprisingly few studies have explicitly compared different sampling techniques in the ideal design where there was a one-to-one correspondence among different sampling methods on the same piece of dead wood at the same time (but see Øklan”
• Measuring the dispersal of saproxylic insects: a key characteristic for their conservation (2006, unknown): “only species associated with that microhabitat (Ranius and Jansson 2002) were considered.”
• What window traps can tell us: effect of placement, forest openness and beetle reproduction in retention trees (2009, unknown): “Using other traps or sampling techniques can sometimes give additional insight, but they all have their disadvantages (reviewed in e.g. Alinvi et al. 2007; Hyvarinen et al. 2006; Ranius and Jansson 2002; Wikars et al. 2005; Økland 1996).”