Measuring the dispersal of saproxylic insects: a key characteristic for their conservation

By T. Ranius. Population Ecology, 2006

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f76ca2bf50a228aa166bf3e8557258fb6f85dacc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. U. Sinsch
2. Markus Rink
3. B. Schröder
4. T. Ranius

In Insect Science

1. S. Nilsson
2. Henrik G. Smith
3. J. Hedin
4. T. Ranius
5. Markus Rink
6. U. Sinsch
7. P. Audisio
8. J. Buse

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. U. Sinsch
2. Markus Rink
3. S. Nilsson
4. Henrik G. Smith
5. J. Hedin
6. T. Ranius
7. P. Audisio
8. Ö. Fritz

Citations in the corpus

• Restricted dispersal in a flying beetle assessed by telemetry (2008, background): “…patterns indicate that several other species dependent on tree hollows have limited colonisation capacity (Nilsson and Baranowski 1997), however, there are also data indicating that O. eremita may have a lower dispersal rate than most other beetle species inhabiting hollow oaks (Ranius 2006).”
• Biodiversity in European beech forests - a review with recommendations for sustainable forest management (2010, background): “More knowledge on how beech forest species disperse between patches of suitable habitat (often across a hostile matrix) is therefore necessary (Ranius 2006).”
• A Red List of Italian Saproxylic Beetles: taxonomic overview, ecological features and conservation issues (Coleoptera) (2015, background): “Consequently, the species associated with this micro-habitat have generally a lower dispersal ability than species that live in more ephemeral dead wood resources (Ranius 2006).”
• Modelling habitat and spatial distribution of an endangered longhorn beetle - A case study for saproxylic insect conservation (2007, background): “In the case of many other saproxylic beetles (Grove, 2002; Ranius, 2006), the distance to the next colonised oak tree is a significant predictor of occurrence probability.”
• Conflict between insect conservation and public safety: the case study of a saproxylic beetle (Osmoderma eremita) in urban parks (2010, background): “200 m in Northern Europe (for Sweden: Ranius and Hedin 2001; Ranius 2006; Hedin et al. 2008) and reaches up to 700 m in Southern Europe (for France: Dubois and Vignon 2008).”
• Radio‐telemetric monitoring of dispersing stag beetles: implications for conservation (2007, methodology): “Still, in most insects, even those that are considered endangered neither dispersal abilities nor population dynamics are adequately studied, partly due to the lack of suitable monitoring methods (Ranius, 2006).”