Sampling the rarest: threatened beetles in boreal forest biodiversity inventories

By P. Martikainen, J. Kouki. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2003

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0796378947f2e652305581f3907de653b331001

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. B. Jonsson
2. Nicholas Kruys
3. E. Hyvärinen
4. J. Kouki
5. P. Martikainen
6. T. Ranius
7. M. Mönkkönen

In Global and Planetary Change

1. B. Jonsson
2. J. Kouki
3. E. Hyvärinen
4. T. Ranius
5. P. Martikainen
6. Nicholas Kruys
7. Maarit Similä
8. B. Nordén

In Insect Science

1. J. Kouki
2. B. Jonsson
3. P. Martikainen
4. Nicholas Kruys
5. T. Ranius
6. Maarit Similä
7. E. Hyvärinen
8. F. Götmark

Citations in the corpus

• Ecology of Species Living on Dead Wood - Lessons for Dead Wood Management (2005, methodology): “In a sampling study for wood-living beetles, Martikainen and Kouki (2003) showed that very large samples are required for accurate descriptions of the fauna and occurrence of red-listed species.”
• What window traps can tell us: effect of placement, forest openness and beetle reproduction in retention trees (2009, unknown): “Even though the most efficient method for ensuring large samples in forest is the window trap (Hyvarinen et al. 2006), the limitations in the use of these traps have been focused by several authors lately (Jonsell and Weslien 2003; Martikainen and Kouki 2003; Ranius and Jansson 2002; Wikars et al.”
• Co-variation and indicators of species diversity: Can richness of forest-dwelling species be predicted in northern boreal forests? (2006, background): “Beetles is a very timeconsuming and expensive species group in terms of sampling costs for inventory (Martikainen and Kouki, 2003; Juutinen et al., 2004; Juutinen and Mönkkönen, 2004) which also limits its usefulness as a surrogate for species richness in general.”
• Factors and scales potentially important for saproxylic beetles in temperate mixed oak forest (2007, result): “Martikainen and Kouki (2003), who compiled beetle studies from boreal forests (where oak did not occur), reported similar results.”
• A comparison of three trapping methods used to survey forest-dwelling Coleoptera (2006, methodology): “But this is clearly not the case, since boreal forests harbour a surprisingly high number of coleopteran species, easily reaching a level of one thousand species per stand (Hanski & Hammond, 1995; Muona, 1999; Martikainen & Kouki, 2003).”