Osmoderma eremita as an indicator of species richness of beetles in tree hollows

By T. Ranius. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2002

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a5f73af76729f4301d3b39c6e1374d4fa3acb80

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Hollow beech trees identified as keystone structures for saproxylic beetles by analyses of functional and phylogenetic diversity (2014, background): “Studies on hollow oaks in Sweden also revealed the landscape matrix as an important driver for the assemblages of a particular tree beyond local tree characteristics (Ranius, 2002a).”
Tree related microhabitats in temperate and Mediterranean European forests: A hierarchical typology for inventory standardization (2018, background): “The relationship at the TreM scale between cavity types such as woodpecker breeding cavities, mould cavities or dendrotelms, and the species communities they host is relatively well known and documented (e.g. Gossner et al., 2016; Gouix and Brustel, 2012; Martin and Eadie, 1999; Ranius, 2002).”
Wood-decaying fungi in the forest: conservation needs and management options (2007, background): “of tree hollows Osmoderma eremita (Ranius 2002).”
A Red List of Italian Saproxylic Beetles: taxonomic overview, ecological features and conservation issues (Coleoptera) (2015, background): “According to Ranius (2002c), each cavity in the trunk of an old tree can be seen as an habitat fragment, suitable to support a local population of O. eremita; each population is more or less connected with the other, through dispersal, forming a system of meta-populations (Ranius 2002a, c).”
Recommendations for Assessing the Effectiveness of Surrogate Species Approaches (2006, methodology): “Methods Collected field data to test surrogates and other species 11 8 7 26 Kremen 1992; Oliver and Beattie 1996; Swengel and Swengel 1999; Chase et al. 2000; Hughes et al. 2000; Kerr et al. 2000; Sahlen and Ekestubbe 2001; Fleishman et al. 2002, 2003; Mac Nally and Fleishman 2002, 2004; Ranius 200”
Restricted dispersal in a flying beetle assessed by telemetry (2008, methodology): “…efforts should focus both on preserving remaining O. eremita populations in stands of hollow trees and creating new suitable hollow trees near these (most within 200 m distance), possibly by speeding up the creation of hollows in present young and medium-age trees (Key and Ball 1993; Ranius 2002b).”
“Primeval forest relict beetles” of Central Europe: a set of 168 umbrella species for the protection of primeval forest remnants (2018, background): “By protecting and managing forest habitats for these species, a range of taxa, including many wood and forest-inhabiting birds, fungi, mosses and lichens, might benefit from an umbrella effect (e.g. Ranius 2002; Foit et al.”
Co-variation and indicators of species diversity: Can richness of forest-dwelling species be predicted in northern boreal forests? (2006, background): “…group together with certain dead wood variables (e.g. volume and diversity of dead wood) may be a useful tool in selecting forest stands to be set aside for the conservation of dead wood dependent species (see also Sverdrup-Thygeson, 2001; Ranius, 2002; Kati et al., 2004; Schmit et al., 2005).”
Usefulness of the Umbrella Species Concept as a Conservation Tool (2004, background): “…species that are among the most sensitive to threatening factors operating at landscape and bioregional scales (Lambeck 1999), whereas species of invertebrates and nonvascular plants could be among the most sensitive to threats operating at finer spatial scales (Angelstam 1998a; Ranius 2002).”