Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals
By H. Daller, R. Hout, Jeanine Treffers-Daller. 2003
304 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Gender Studies, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1d972bd3fe3e3ac6fde4dfaffe26c4633daf1c7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- Danielle S. McNamara
- Tom Salsbury
- Weixin Liang
- James Y. Zou
- Jeanine Treffers-Daller
- Mert Yuksekgonul
- Guoxing Yu
In Gender Studies
In Language and Linguistics
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- Danielle S. McNamara
- Tom Salsbury
- Jeanine Treffers-Daller
- Reyhan Furman
- James Y. Zou
- Núria Planas
- Guoxing Yu
Citations in the corpus
- Bilingual students using their languages in the learning of mathematics (2009, background): “We consider the construction and use of the language essentially as a social process embedded in social interaction that takes place in social participation structures where issues of identity and power are structural (Fairclough, 1989, 2001). This process of construction and use of the language is ”
- Assessing Lexical Proficiency Using Analytic Ratings: A Case for Collocation Accuracy (2014, background): “The production of infrequent words is an important indicator of lexical knowledge, with more proficient lexicons characterized by the use of less frequent words (Daller et al. 2003; Crossley et al. 2011a, b).”
- The Development of Polysemy and Frequency Use in English Second Language Speakers (2010, background): “In addition, lexical growth is strongly related to academic achievement (Daller, van Hout, & Treffers-Daller, 2003).”
- Transfer of conceptualization patterns in bilinguals: The construal of motion events in Turkish and German* (2010, background): “5 In Daller et al. (2003) we studied the same university students (B stud) and returnees (B return), and in Treffers-Daller et al. (2007) we studied these same groups, as well as the monolingual control group (Mono T) from Marmara University.”
- Predicting Second Language Writing Proficiency: The Roles of Cohesion and Linguistic Sophistication (2012, background): “Linguistic sophistication is important because it relates to the depth of linguistic knowledge by language learners and strongly correlates with language proficiency and academic achievement (Daller, van Hout & Treffers-Daller, 2003).”
- Lexical Diversity in Writing and Speaking Task Performances (2010, background): “richness (e.g., Daller, van Hout, & Treffers-Daller, 2003; Singh, 2001), lexical density (e.g., Backman, 1978; Hyltenstam, 1988; O’Loughlin, 1994, 1995), lexical sophistication or rareness (see Read, 2000: 203), lexical variation or variety (e.g., Granger & Wynne, 2000; Hyltenstam, 1988; Linnarud,”
- Psycholinguistic word information in second language oral discourse (2011, background): “Generally, word difficulty is argued to correlate with word frequency counts for common words found in large corpora (Vermeer, 2000; Meara and Bell, 2001; Daller et al., 2003).”
- GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers (2023, background): “Non-native English writers have been shown to exhibit reduced linguistic variability in terms of lexical richness (Laufer & Nation, 1995), lexical diversity (Jarvis, 2002; Daller et al., 2003), syntactic complexity (Lu, 2011; Crossley & McNamara, 2014; Ortega, 2003), and grammatical complexity (Bibe”