Family business and regional development—A theoretical model of regional familiness

By R. Basco. 2015

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b186a64b6ae163ea2134350f026743494b228289

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Simone Chlosta
2. Massimo Baù
3. Christian Schröder
4. Johan Klaesson
5. Arndt Werner
6. D. Pittino
7. M. Backman

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Simone Chlosta
2. Christian Schröder
3. Arndt Werner
4. D. Pittino

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Simone Chlosta
2. Christian Schröder
3. Arndt Werner
4. D. Pittino

Citations in the corpus

• Roots to Grow: Family Firms and Local Embeddedness in Rural and Urban Contexts (2018, background): “…& Wennberg, 2014; Zellweger, Nason, Nordqvist, & Brush, 2013) and the key contribution of family firms to GDP and job creation in different regional contexts worldwide (e.g., Basco, 2015; Bjuggren, Johansson & Sjogren, 2011; Memili, Fang, Chrisman, & De Massis, 2015; Astrachan & Shanker, 2003).”
• Driving factors of innovation in family and non-family SMEs (2018, background): “In the following, we elaborate the principal agent (Jensen and Meckling 1976), the principal problem (Le Breton-Miller et al. 2011; Miller et al. 2013) as well as approaches which highlight the local embeddedness of family firms (e.g., Basco 2013; Block and Spiegel 2013; Davis 1983; Lee 2006).”