Responses to other-imposed pro-black pressure: Acceptance or backlash?

By E. A. Plant, Patricia G. Devine, Blanchard, Brenda Buswell, Amanda B. Brodish, Stephanie L. Vance, Erin Goldman, Suzanne C. Klonis, David M. Amodio, Paige C. Brazy and 11 more. 2001

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0aac577326940b7b96064eea3514317d2a9ecc2e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Perspective taking combats the denial of intergroup discrimination (2012, background): “Introducing a perspective-taking mindset in this way could initiate self-generated thought processes (Tesser, 1978) that are more instrumental in effecting belief change than externally-imposedpressures to conform to egalitarian norms, which are vulnerable to backlash (Plant and Devine, 2001).”
The existence of implicit bias is beyond reasonable doubt: A refutation of ideological and methodological objections and executive summary of ten studies that no manager should ignore (2009, unknown): “…this as an unrealistically optimistic position, especially given the complexity of research ﬁndings demonstrating that diversity training can backﬁre (Plant & Devine, 2001; Roberson, Kulik, & Pepper, 2001, 2003; see also Macrae et al., 1994) and that accountability often has no salutary effect on…”
Mixed Signals: The Unintended Effects of Diversity Initiatives (2019, background): “Furthermore, exposure to diversity training and similar initiatives may create external pressure to avoid expressing prejudice, leading people to hide or disguise bias in their interactions members of underrepresented groups (Plant & Devine, 2001).”
The Effect of Target Status on Witnesses' Reactions to Confrontations of Bias (2010, background): “Similarly, Plant and Devine (2001) demonstrated that people with low internal but high external motivation to appear egalitarian may respond with backlash against pressure to comply with pro-Black ideals.”
The role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in emotion-related phenomena: a review and update. (2010, unknown): “Along these lines, past research found that some people feel anger when required to comply with social pressure to respond without racial prejudice (Plant and Devine, 2001).”
Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. (2004, background): “…that everyone engages in the same associative process when they encounter a stigmatized group member, but that individuals with more egalitarian goals inhibit their stereotyped thoughts and replace them with nonprejudice beliefs (e.g., Devine, 1989; Devine & Monteith, 1999; Plant & Devine, 2001).”
The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: the role of motivations to respond without prejudice. (2002, background): “Consistent with the previous work, in the studies reported in the present article, the average correlation between the IMS and EMS was .11 (see also Plant & Devine, 2001a; Plant et al., 2002).”
Erasing the Stigma: Where Science Meets Advocacy (2013, unknown): “…“rebound” effect in which attitudes and prejudices about a group remain unchanged or actually become worse (Gordijn, Hindriks, Koomen, Dijksterhuis, & Van Knippenberg, 2004; Liberman & Förster, 2000; Macrae, Bodenhausen, Milne, & Jetten, 1994; Plant & Devine, 2001; Wenzlaff & Wegner, 2000).”