Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production: current status

By B. Dien, M. Cotta, Thomas W. Jeffries. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2003

814 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Biotechnology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0f9aa8c587972fb3bf944a1f53212e37a0988fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Overview of biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production. (2009, background): “[12] Dien B S, Cotta M A, Jeffries T W.”
Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: A review (2017, background): “0 g/L/h), growth in simple, inexpensive media and undiluted fermentation broth with resistance to inhibitors and retard contaminants from growth condition [15].”
Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass (2004, background): “The performance of genetically engineered S. cerevisiae, Z. mobilis, and E. coli in lignocellulosic hydrolysates has been reviewed recently by Zaldivar et al. (2001) and Dien et al. (2003) .”
Economics and environmental impact of bioethanol production technologies: an appraisal (2007, background): “The second approach is to improve ethanol yields by genetic engineering in microorganisms that have the ability to ferment both hexoses and pentoses (Jeffries and Jin, 2000; Dien et al., 2003; Katharia et al., 2006).”
Biological Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Biofuels and Bioproducts: An Overview (2017, background): “However, anaerobic bacteria like Zymomonas mobilis is a notable cellulolytic candidate and can be used in fermentation of sucrose, glucose and fructose to give high yield of ethanol [62].”
Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects (2006, background): “Escherichia coli KO11 0.7–0.1 Dien et al. 2003; ”
Bio-ethanol--the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. (2006, background): “Consequently, most research efforts have been devoted to thedevelopmentof efficientxylose-fermentingmicroorganisms [ 27 ,28].”
An optimization framework for identifying reaction activation/inhibition or elimination candidates for overproduction in microbial systems. (2006, background): “coli balances fermentation by also producing acetate, lactate and succinate which compromises the yield of ethanol (Dien et al., 2003).”
Bioconversion of pentose sugars into ethanol: A review and future directions (2011, methodology): “Detailed information regarding the development of GEMs has been reviewed by Dien et al. (2003), Hahn-Hagerdal et al. (2007) and Matsushika et al. (2009).”
Hemicelluloses for fuel ethanol: A review. (2010, background): “ble to contaminations; low tolerance to lignocellulose-derived inhibitors; low ethanol tolerance; and mixed-product formation (ethanol, acetic acid, lactic acid and others), reducing ethanol yield (Dien et al., 2003).”