Unpacking Path Dependence: Differential Valuations Accorded History Across Disciplines

By P. Hirsch, J. Gillespie. 2001

54 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0e07232e045926877d5f0c1cd2026dd8cbbefd7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Rodolphe Durand
2. Jean-Philippe Vergne
3. S. Manning
4. James Simmie
5. Matthew A. Barlow
6. Li Dai
7. Tyler Wry
8. Linda S. Henderson

Citations in the corpus

• The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications (2010, methodology): “…dependence (Liebowitz and Margolis, 1990), while others go as far as to wonder whether ‘path dependence operates in the real world . . . or whether it is purely a theoretical artifact’ (Hirsch and Gillespie, 2001, p. 72; see also Ekelund and Tollison, 1997, p. 387; Liebowitz and Margolis, 1994).”
• Projects, paths, and practices: sustaining and leveraging project-based relationships (2011, background): “We, therefore, invite multi-level studies to analyze collaborative paths and their co-evolution with economic, institutional and technological conditions (Koza & Lewin, 1998; Hirsch & Gillespie, 2001; Jones, 2001; Burgelman, 2002).”