Entry barriers and new venture performance: a comparison of universal and contingency approaches

By Kenneth C. Robinson, P. P. McDougall. 2001

248 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0c30ab770fa09746eead938bd5085ff48ac9d11

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

New Venture Growth: A Review and Extension (2006, methodology): “We began with Sandberg’s (1986) model of new venture performance that he derived from his study of venture capital−backed growth-oriented firms.”
Firm and industry effects on firm performance: A generalization and extension for new ventures (2009, background): “In contrast to past studies’ use of profi t measures, we examine sales and sales growth—the most prominent measures of new venture performance ( Robinson and McDougall, 2001 )—and survival—a metric that has a history within entrepreneurship, strategic management, and organization theory.”
A Meta‐Analysis of Achievement Motivation Differences between Entrepreneurs and Managers** (2007, background): “…entrepreneurial decision-making, which, in conjunction with the resulting strategy and important external factors, such as industry conditions (cf. Robinson and McDougall 2001; Sandberg and Hofer 1987), have more potential to clarify the links between the entrepreneur and the performance of the…”
Identification of domains for a new conceptual model of strategic entrepreneurship using the configuration approach (2011, methodology): “the universal approach and the contingency approach (Robinson and McDougall, 2001).”
The relative influence of competitive intensity and business strategy on the relationship between financial leverage and performance (2008, result): “Some researchers (e.g., O’Brien, 2003; Robinson and Mcdougall, 2001; Barton and Gordon, 1987) argue that the conflicting evidence reported by prior studies may be due in part to the approaches used.”
International Exposure Through Network Relationships: Implications for New Venture Internationalization (2013, methodology): “Lastly, all ventures that were corporately held or that resulted from a corporate spin-off were eliminated from the sample (e.g., Carpenter et al., 2003, Florin et al., 2003 and Robinson and McDougall, 2001), leaving only those new ventures that were independently owned and operated.”
The Past and the Future of International Entrepreneurship: A Review and Suggestions for Developing the Field (2009, background): “…(1998) Qian (2002) Qian and Li (2003) Rasheed (2005) Requena-Silvente (2005) Reuber and Fischer (1997) Reuber and Fischer (2002) Reynolds (1997) Robinson and McDougall (2001) Sapienza, Autio, George, and Zahra (2006) Sapienza, De Clercq, and Sandberg (2005) Shane (1997) Shrader (2001) Shrader,…”
Corporate Venture Capitalists and Independent Venture Capitalists: What do they know, Who do They Know and Should Entrepreneurs Care? (2005, background): “A technology-based new firm was defined as a firm less than six years old (Zahra et al., 2000; Robinson & McDougall, 2001; Shrader, 2001) and operating in one of the following sectors: biotechnology, medical/health science, Internet specific, communications, computer software and services, computer…”
Venture Capitalists as Catalysts to New Venture Internationalization: The Impact of Their Knowledge and Reputation Resources (2009, unknown): “Following other studies using IPO venture data (e.g., Carpenter et al., 2003; Florin et al., 2003; Robinson & McDougall, 2001), all firms that were corporately held or the result of a corporate spin-off were eliminated from the sample.”
Business angels and value added: what do we know and where do we go? (2008, background): “This avenue of research may call for a contingency approach (Donaldson 2001; Robinson and McDougall 2001), which would emphasize that the difference between potential and realized value added may be contingent upon conditions in the internal and external environment of the new venture.”
The Impact of Interorganizational Imitation on New Venture International Entry and Performance (2010, background): “Consistent with previous studies (Lu & Beamish, 2001; Robinson & McDougall, 2001; Shrader, 2001), the ROS was calculated to assess the profitability of a new venture.”