Toward a neurophenomenology as an account of generative passages: a first empirical case study

By Antoine Lutz. 2002

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b00502b8afb43994c3dd1f67d41c150676894022

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Phenomenological Mind (2007, unknown): “In Lutz et al. (2002) the trials were clustered according to first-person descriptive reports concerning the experience of subjective parameters, and for each cluster separate dynamical analyses of electrical brain activity, recorded by EEG, were conducted.”
Phenomenological Psychopathology and Schizophrenia: Contemporary Approaches and Misunderstandings (2011, background): “One proposal, entitled neurophenomenology, was initially proposed by Varela (1996) and subsequently developed by Lutz (2002), Lutz and Thompson (2003), and Thompson (2007). Here, the basic idea is to train experimental subjects to gain greater intimacy with their own experiences.”
Neurophenomenology Integrating Subjective Experience and Brain Dynamics in the Neuroscience of Consciousness (2003, methodology): “In this paper, we explore a research programme called ‘neurophenomenology’ that aims to make progress on these issues (Varela, 1996; 1997; 1999; Bitbol, 2002; Lutz, 2002; Rudrauf et al., 2003).”
Framing a phenomenological interview: what, why and how (2016, methodology): “…example is the use of interviews within the so-called method of neurophenomenology to help combine neuroscience and phenomenology (Varela 1996; Lutz et al. 2002; Lutz 2002; Lutz and Thompson 2003; Reinerman-Jones et al. 2013; Bockelman et al. 2013; Gallagher et al. 2014; Colombetti 2014, chap 6.).”
Neurophenomenology: An Introduction for Neurophilosophers (2005, background): “In addition, thirdperson (biobehavioural) data produced in this manner might eventually constrain firstperson data, so that the relationship between the two would become one of dynamic reciprocal constraints (Varela 1996; Lutz 2002).”
Horizons for the Enactive Mind: Values, Social Interaction, and Play (2010, methodology): “Because the performance criterion rates the behavior of an agent in a given environment, not its input/output mappings, this method provides a natural account of the situatedness, embodiment, and dynamics of behavior.”
The extended body: a case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction (2012, unknown): “Applications of this methodology can be found in: Varela (1999); Lutz (2002); and Petitmengin et al. (2007).”
Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness (2006, methodology): “…case in some neuro-phenomenological protocols, which consist of having an interviewee carry out a cognitive task, while recording his EEG, for example the 3D vision protocol developed by Lutz (2002): the description of subjective experience can be gathered immediately after the task is performed.”
The Validity of First-Person Descriptions as Authenticity and Coherence (2009, background): “In Lutz’s protocol (Lutz, 2002; Lutz et al., 2002), it is the distribution of the neuro-electric data in three classes or ‘phenomenological clusters’, according to the values of a generic experiential category, which made it possible to distinguish three distinct dynamic neuronal configurations or…”