Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness
By Claire Peugeot Petitmengin. 2006
695 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7009136ec90ff9db655bec2a08b5eca261103c3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Anthony Vincent Fernandez
- A. Køster
- C. Valenzuela-Moguillansky
- R. Light
- Alain Mouchet
- Anne Remillieux
- Stephen Harvey
- Chris Letheby
In Social Psychology
- Stephen Harvey
- Alain Mouchet
- R. Light
- Anthony Vincent Fernandez
- A. Køster
- C. Valenzuela-Moguillansky
- Anne Remillieux
- Chris Letheby
Citations in the corpus
- The Validity of First-Person Descriptions as Authenticity and Coherence (2009, background): “In the context of an interview, a set of devices enable a trained interviewer to help the person (Vermersch, 1994; Petitmengin, 2006).”
- Discovering the structures of lived experience (2018, methodology): “This interview method was then adapted to research in cognitive sciences (Petitmengin 2006) to describe any type of lived experience, in the clinical and therapeutic domains (Petitmengin et al. 2007; Petitmengin 2010; Valenzuela-Moguillansky 2013; Balzani et al. 2014; Bourvis 3 For a more detailed…”
- Improving ‘at-action’ decision-making in team sports through a holistic coaching approach (2014, methodology): “This research has been conducted using psycho-phenomenological methodology (Vermersch, 1994; Petitmangin, 2006; Maurel, 2009) to help players relive experiences of decision-making in competition matches.”
- Quality of Acute Psychedelic Experience Predicts Therapeutic Efficacy of Psilocybin for Treatment-Resistant Depression (2018, background): “We should be conscious of not being too attached (or averse) to any specific theoretical frameworks however, and approaches that endeavor to access “frameworkfree” descriptions of phenomena may prove particularly useful in this regard (Varela, 1996; Petitmengin, 2006).”
- Being for no-one (2020, background): “It is fair to say that more research is required on this point, possibly utilising new psychometric instruments or techniques such as “microphenomenological” interviewing (Petitmengin, 2006; cf. Millière, 2017; Sebastián, 2020, this issue).”
- Investigating modes of being in the world: an introduction to Phenomenologically grounded qualitative research (2021, methodology): “…experiences to language and the explicit methodological intention of letting the interview be structured and guided by the interviewer’s extensive “meta-knowledge” of experiential structures (see, e.g., Petitmengin 2006, 250), which is similar to what we have framed in terms of front-loading.”
- Framing a phenomenological interview: what, why and how (2016, background): “Petitmengin (2006) has done excellent work in systematically presenting these difficulties in her EI framework.”