Three Dimensions of the Amyloid Hypothesis: Time, Space, and “Wingmen”

By E. Musiek, D. Holtzman. Nature Neuroscience, 2015

657 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The amyloid hypothesis, which has been the predominant framework for research in Alzheimer's disease (AD), has been the source of considerable controversy. The amyloid hypothesis postulates that amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) is the causative agent in AD. It is strongly supported by data from rare autosomal dominant forms of AD. However, the evidence that Aβ causes or contributes to age-associated sporadic AD is more complex and less clear, prompting criticism of the hypothesis. We provide an overview of the major arguments for and against the amyloid hypothesis. We conclude that Aβ likely is the key initiator of a complex pathogenic cascade that causes AD. However, we argue that Aβ acts primarily as a trigger of other downstream processes, particularly tau aggregation, which mediate neurodegeneration. Aβ appears to be necessary, but not sufficient, to cause AD. Its major pathogenic effects may occur very early in the disease process.

Subfields: Pharmacology, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afd589b6f8fa484dc5216528bfcf8b7a85f148e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Pharmacology

  1. J. Long
  2. R. Swerdlow
  3. D. Holtzman

In Physiology

  1. J. Long
  2. R. Swerdlow
  3. Claudio Franceschi
  4. Urmi Sengupta
  5. M. Conte
  6. Daniela Monti
  7. Andrea Grignolio
  8. Paolo Garagnani

In Psychiatry and Mental health

  1. J. Long
  2. R. Swerdlow
  3. D. Holtzman

Citations in the corpus