V. CONTEMPORARY ADVANCES AND CLASSIC ADVICE FOR ANALYZING MEDIATING AND MODERATING VARIABLES

By E. Dearing, L. Hamilton. 2006

350 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afc3ca9d12f5e5f6add77c48bcf1d445f7abcca8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary–neurodevelopmental theory (2011, background): “In short, the first always concerns the application of conventional statistical criteria for evaluating moderation (Dearing & Hamilton, 2006).”
Differential Susceptibility to Environmental Influences (2013, background): “And Deater-Deckard and Dodge (1997) reported that children rated highest on externalizing-behavior problems by teachers across the primary-school years were those who experienced the most harsh discipline prior to kindergarten entry and who were characterized by mothers at age 5 as being negatively ”
Beyond diathesis stress: differential susceptibility to environmental influences. (2009, background): “…statistical criteria for evaluating genuine moderation of a putative environmental influence by an organismic plasticity or susceptibility factor (Dearing & Hamilton, 2006), with some emphasis placed on excluding interactions with regression lines that do not cross (sometimes referred to as…”
Adolescents’ Perceptions of School Environment, Engagement, and Academic Achievement in Middle School (2010, methodology): “Baron and Kenny’s (1986) causal step approach to identify mediation has been criticized for the lack of providing a direct hypothesis test for mediation, flexibility to deal with two or more mediators, and statistical power (see Dearing & Hamilton, 2006, for a review).”
The differential effects of parental divorce and marital conflict on young adult romantic relationships (2010, methodology): “…behavior (−.09) was reliably different from zero using the recommended procedure of evaluating statistical significance with bootstrapped standard error (95% confidence interval based on 2,000 resamples: −.16 to −.02; Dearing & Hamilton, 2006; Fritz & MacKinnon, 2007; Shrout & Bolger, 2002).”
Preschoolers' Emotion Regulation Strategy Understanding: Relations with Emotion Socialization and Child Self-regulation (2009, methodology): “We constructed the standard sequence of steps for testing mediation using regression (Baron & Kenny, 1986) and, because the sample size was less than 400, we used the bootstrapping method (Preacher & Hayes, 2004) to determine whether mediation could be inferred (Dearing & Hamilton, 2006).”
More gratitude, less materialism: The mediating role of life satisfaction (2009, methodology): “…0.94 (products of the corresponding unstandardized coefficients), which was reliably different from 0 using the recommended procedure of evaluating statistical significance with bootstrapped standard error (95% Confidence Interval based on 1000 resamples 0.15 to 2.33; see Dearing & Hamilton, 2006).”
A General Model for Testing Mediation and Moderation Effects (2009, methodology): “Previous research has described the differences between mediation and moderation and has provided methods to analyze them separately (e.g., Dearing and Hamilton 2006; Frazier et al. 2004; Gogineni et al. 1995; Rose et al. 2004).”
Suppressor Variables: The Difference Between ‘is’ Versus ‘Acting As’ (2014, background): “experimental, introduction of an intervention variable that accounts for some of the covariance between X1 and the criterion (Baron and Kenny 1986; Dearing and Hamilton 2006; MacKinnon, Krull, and Lockwood 2000).”