Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans: Common Problems and Diverse Solutions

By A. Hedrick. 2002

416 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af5bbaa1e6336eea28baf1b76de405c6b2a2aabc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citations in the corpus

The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research (2011, background): “Probably, a convergent evolution of a Lombard effect has not occurred in insects because there seems to be very strong selection for increased loudness of acoustic signals in this group (Gerhardt & Huber, 2002).”
A primer of acoustic analysis for landscape ecologists (2011, background): “…principles (Hopp et al. 1998; Krause 2002), acoustic data analysis (Charif et al. 2006; Sueur et al. 2008a, b), and the biological basis of sound production and hearing (Bradbury and Vehrencamp 1998; Ryan 2001; Gerhardt and Huber 2002; Marler and Slabbekoorn 2004; Kroodsma 2005; Fletcher 2007).”
Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses (2004, background): “, pulse rate) function in species identification (Ewing 1989; Bailey 1991; Gerhardt 1991) while other more dynamic properties indicate male quality (Gerhardt and Huber 2002).”
Vibrational communication in insects (2004, background): “Recently published comprehensive reviews exist for air-borne acoustic communication in insects (Gerhardt & Huber 2002) or vibrational communication in spiders (Barth 2002) but are not available for insect vibrational communication.”
Acoustic preferences and localization performance of blood-sucking flies (Corethrella Coquillett) to túngara frog calls (2006, background): “Given that the structure of sound influences its localizability (reviewed in Klump and Shalter 1984; Gerhardt and Huber 2002), we asked if the flies are more successful at reaching the sound source when calling males produce complex instead of simple calls.”
The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird (2004, background): “Moreover, such a relationship between body size and vocal amplitude has been found in anurans and insects (review in Gerhardt & Huber 2002).”
Song amplitude affects territorial aggression of male receivers in chaffinches (2011, background): “Interestingly, similar converse intra- and intersexual selection of male acoustic signals has been suggested for anurans and insects (Gerhardt and Huber 2002).”
Neural processing of natural sounds (2014, background): “The neuro-ethological basis of this matched frequency tuning has been particularly well documented in insects and anurans [26].”
Vast underestimation of Madagascar's biodiversity evidenced by an integrative amphibian inventory (2009, background): “Similar continuous differences are also known among populations of a species, often because of character displacement or adaptation to environmental factors (59).”
Female preference for complex/novel signals in a spider (2006, background): “…signals and observing female responses (Ryan and Keddyhector 1992; Andersson 1994; McClintock and Uetz 1996; Rosenthal 1999; Hebets and Uetz 2000; Gerhardt and Huber 2002; Guerra and Morris 2002) or in systems where male signals show large geographical variation, performing reciprocal mating…”
Calls, colours, shape, and genes: a multi-trait approach to the study of geographic variation in the Amazonian frog Allobates femoralis (2009, background): “…strong constraining or diversifying selective pres- © 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 98, 826–838 sures, whereas a role for neutral processes, such as isolation by distance, is rarely considered (Wilczynski & Ryan, 1999; Gerhardt & Huber, 2002).”
The Behavioral Ecology of Anuran Communication (2007, background): “…and they often exhibit considerable plasticity in their use of different call elements, responding to changes in local chorus density, the presence of nearby conspecific and heterospecific callers, and to approaching females by modifying their vocal signals (Wells 1988; Gerhardt and Huber 2002).”
Acoustic communication in a noisy world: can fish compete with anthropogenic noise? (2014, background): “It is also likely that noise-dependent regulation of signal amplitude does not occur in insects because there seems to be strong selection for increased loudness in this group, meaning they are often signaling close to their power capabilities anyway (Gerhardt and Huber 2002).”
Fighting success and attractiveness as predictors of male mating success in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus: the effectiveness of no-choice tests (2005, background): “Male crickets attract females by loud and intense calling (Gerhard and Huber 2002).”
Bat serenades—complex courtship songs of the sac-winged bat (Saccopteryx bilineata) (2004, background): “Thus whistles may be regarded as “dynamic parameters” (Gerhardt and Huber 2002) and females might use them as measure of the male’s physical abilities.”
Aggressive contests in house crickets: size, motivation and the information content of aggressive songs (2006, result): “Other studies have also reported no relationship between calling song structure and size in crickets, or inconsistent relationships (see Gerhardt & Huber 2002).”
Musical Rhythm, Linguistic Rhythm, and Human Evolution (2006, neutral): “See Gerhardt & Huber, 2002, ch.8, and Patel, Iversen, Chen, & Repp, 2005, for further discussion).”