Acoustic communication in a noisy world: can fish compete with anthropogenic noise?
By A. Radford, E. Kerridge, Stephen D. Simpson. 2014
257 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4c23e3a5dd33dd44501ebfa757acdcedb5ecafd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental Biology
- Charlotte Christensen
- Adelaide V. Lindseth
- Julia Heiler
- T. Gridley
- H. J. Kriesell
- P. Lobel
- A. Radford
- S. Elwen
In Ecology
- Charlotte Christensen
- Adelaide V. Lindseth
- Julia Heiler
- T. Gridley
- H. J. Kriesell
- P. Lobel
- A. Radford
- S. Elwen
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Changes in bottlenose dolphin whistle parameters related to vessel presence, surface behaviour and group composition (2016, background): “These are summarized by Radford, Kerridge, and Simpson (2014) as (1) avoidance of noise, by moving away from the noise source or adjusting the timing of acoustic signals to coincide with low noise periods, (2) adjustment of acoustic signal temporal parameters, such as increasing call duration or…”
- Underwater Soundscape Monitoring and Fish Bioacoustics: A Review (2018, background): “Currently, several hundred fish species, which are diversified throughout dozens of families and orders, have been identified as sound producers [16,31,33,34].”
- Dear enemies or nasty neighbors? Causes and consequences of variation in the responses of group-living species to territorial intrusions (2018, background): “example, anthropogenic noise—the sounds produced by human activities—can have a negative impact on animal communication and the use of environmental cues (Radford et al. 2014; Shannon et al. 2016).”