Fighting success and attractiveness as predictors of male mating success in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus: the effectiveness of no-choice tests

By M. A. Shackleton, Michael D. Jennions, J. Hunt. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2005

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec4660002d7bed0e7eb4b23b6eb1585cf65b1096

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Aggressive contests in house crickets: size, motivation and the information content of aggressive songs (2006, result): “Our results reinforce the view that body mass is the most important determinant of RHP in crickets and most other animals (Alexander 1961; Dixon & Cade 1986; Simmons 1986; Souroukis & Cade 1993; Hack 1997; Nosil 2002; Shackleton et al. 2005; but see Tachon et al. 1999).”
Female preference for male courtship song and its role as a signal of immune function and condition (2006, methodology): “For each of the five pairs of songs, we examined the responses of 16 females to the high-quality song and of 16 different females to the low-quality song, using a no-choice design (Shackleton et al. 2005) in which female preference is measured through latency to respond to a single stimulus.”
Decisions during fights in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus: mutual or self assessment of energy, weapons and size? (2008, background): “2006) and other cricket species (see Simmons 1986; Hofmann & Schildberger 2001; Shackleton et al. 2005) is that contests follow a highly structured pattern and the use of increasingly costly tactics is escalated as the contest progresses.”
Male mate choice: why sequential choice can make its evolution difficult (2010, methodology): “Recent theoretical (Kokko& Ots 2006) as well as empirical (e.g. Schäfer & Uhl 2005; Shackleton et al. 2005; Werner & Lotem 2006; Ivy & Sakaluk 2007; Uetz & Norton 2007) findings emphasize that mate choice follows different rules depending on whether potential mates are encountered simultaneously or…”
Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis (2008, background): “…Observation of agonistic behavior 16 0.71 Natoli et al. (2005) (f) Black field cricket (Teleogryllus commodus) Wild/male Paired contests 30 0.04 Shackleton et al. (2005) Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) Wild/female Observation of agonistic behavior 40 0.35 McPhee and Quinn (1998) Water…”
Do female association preferences predict the likelihood of reproduction? (2010, methodology): “Measures of mating success usually involve scoring the time until the first copulation, the number of times a female copulates with a male or the number of sexual responses from a female (Pilastro et al. 2002; Shackleton et al. 2005).”
The effect of variation in boldness and aggressiveness on the reproductive success of zebrafish (2012, background): “…Erythrocebus patas: Chism & Rogers 1997; meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus: Spritzer et al. 2005; black field crickets, Teleogryllus commodus: Shackleton et al. 2005), submissive males may have a higher reproductive success than aggressive males (black rhinoceroses, Diceros bicornis:…”