Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: A review and an assessment

360 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Growing Plantation Forests (2010, methodology): “Various methods and tools are available to assist in assessing the conflicting options during these negotiations (Ive and Cocks 1988; Baird and Ive 1989; Johnson et al. 1994; Kangas and Kangas 2005; Kangas and Leskinen 2005; Mendoza and Prabhu 2005; Sheppard 2005; Sheppard and Meitner 2005; Diaz-Bal”
Multi-objective multi-agent decision making: a utility-based analysis and survey (2019, background): “Such trade-offs appear in a wide range of domains such as urban transportation [12,38], aviation [58,190], management of natural resources [43,100] and robotics [32,119]; these are all domains where multi-objective multiagent approaches could confer huge benefits.”
Uncertainty and risk in wildland fire management: a review. (2011, background): “Additional investigation into low-quality preference information could address promising areas such as group decision-making techniques (Diaz-Balteiro and Romero, 2008) and voting mechanisms (Kangas et al., 2006).”
State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods (2014, methodology): “(2010) – material choosing and screening; Diaz-Balteiro and Romero (2008) – forestry-related decisions; Ananda and Herath (2009) – forest management and planning.”