The conditioning effect of time on firm survival: An industry life cycle approach

By Ratshree Agarwal, M. Sarkar, Raj Echambadi. 2002

407 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad269447053996389a729ef8d875494c2b6035cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Untangling the relationships among growth, profitability and survival in new firms (2013, unknown): “, 2006) and a fourth is the magnitude of resources a firm needs to commit for a typical project to succeed (Agarwal et al., 2002).”
Institutional Barriers and Industry Dynamics (2014, background): “Last, institutional change parallels a shift in technological regimes that create or destroy competitive advantage (Agarwal et al., 2002; Sarkar et al., 2006; Tushman and Anderson, 1986).”
The Role of Environmental Dynamics in Building a First Mover Advantage Theory (2007, unknown): “Alternatively, OM can be identified using discriminant analysis, as in Agarwal et al. (2002). As these authors show, OM can vary considerably across product categories.”
Exploring the Role of Industry Structure in New Venture Internationalization (2007, unknown): “Industry evolution Refers to whether an industry is just emerging, experiencing rapid growth or in a state of maturity Assessment of gross entry rates into an industry (Agarwal et al., 2002)”
Firm and industry effects on firm performance: A generalization and extension for new ventures (2009, background): “Other scholars fi nd that the time of entry of individual fi rms, life cycle stage of the industry, and density of the industry all have important effects on the survival of new ventures (e.g., Agarwal, Sarkar, and Echambadi, 2002; Suarez and Utterback, 1995).”
Services and the Business Models of Product Firms: An Empirical Analysis of the Software Industry (2013, background): “An abundant body of literature has shown that the point at which the total number of firms peaks often corresponds to the emergence of a major change in industry dynamics that leads to a “shakeout” that announces the onset of maturity (e.g. Agarwal et al. 2002; Utterback and Suarez, 1993).”
The hype cycle model: A review and future directions (2016, background): “Stylized depictions such as the diffusions of innovation (e.g. Rogers, 1962), product life cycle (e.g. Klepper, 1996), industry life cycle (e.g. Agarwal et al., 2002), and technology life cycle (e.g. Abernathy and Utterback, 1978) models aim to reduce these uncertainties through the repeated…”
Performance Differentials Between Diversifying Entrants and Entrepreneurial start-ups: A Complexity Approach (2009, unknown): “Reconciling these three bodies of scholarly work, Agarwal, Sarkar, and Echam- badi (2002) noted that a common theme is the identification of growth and mature life cycle stages, although scholars differ on whether the underlying mechanism relates to “pre and post” dominant design (Abernathy &…”