Affective priming of pronunciation responses: effects of target degradation

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. (2003, background): “(e) De Houwer and his colleagues have introduced an affective variant of the spatial Simon task as an implicit measure of attitudes (De Houwer & Eelen 1998, De Houwer et al. 2001a).”
Affective priming of semantic categorisation responses (2002, background): “…by the observation that affective priming effects can be found when participants are instructed to read words (e.g., Bargh et al., 1996; De Houwer et al., 2001b), but is questioned by the results of lexical decision (Wentura, 2000) and colour naming (e.g., Rothermund & Wentura, 1998)…”
Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, background): “…(under certain conditions) been observed when participants are required to read or name the target (e.g., Bargh, Chaiken, Raymond, & Hymes, 1996; De Houwer et al., 2001; Spruyt et al., 2002), to determine the lexical status (e.g., Wentura, 2000) or semantic category of the target (e.g., Spruyt, De…”
Modulation of automatic semantic priming by feature-specific attention allocation (2009, background): “A few years ago, De Houwer and Randell (2004) demonstrated that reliable affective priming of pronunciation responses can be obtained if pronunciation is made conditional upon the detection of (nonaffective) semantic target information.”