Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects
By Roy Brouwer. 2000
511 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac8e67f03fbd4c109a953d6b108def0af53b55cf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Luke Brander
- G. Atkinson
- Andrea Ghermandi
- P. A. Nunes
- S. Mourato
- S. Navrud
- Ian J. Bateman
- M. E. Salem
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Luke Brander
- Andrea Ghermandi
- P. A. Nunes
- M. E. Salem
- D. Mercer
- S. Navrud
- Alfred J. Wagtendonk
- R. J. Florax
Citations in the corpus
- Benefit Transfer over Time of Ecosystem Values: the Case of Forest Recreation (2005, unknown): “Relatively few of these spatial transfers have tested the accuracy of transferring values and functions across sites, and those who have, found transfer errors up to 475% of the original site value (Brouwer 2000, Loomis et al. 1995, Kirchhoff et al., 1997, Scarpa et al., 2002).”
- Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis (2008, background): “Reviews by Brouwer (77) and Rosenberger & Loomis (78) summarize the findings of a number of these types of tests for recreational resources, water quality improvements, and landscape amenities.”
- Mapping ecosystem services' values: current practice and future prospects. (2013, background): “The specific strengths and weaknesses of different value transfer methodologies are discussed widely in value transfer literature (see for example Brouwer (2000), Navrud and Ready (2007), and Johnston and Rosenberger (2010)) and remain similar for ESS value mapping, but with some further…”
- Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments (2011, background): “…related meta-analyses for environmental goods include Barton, 2002; Bateman et al., 2009d, 2010b; Bateman and Jones, 2003; Bergland et al., 1995; Brouwer, 2000; Brouwer and Spaninks, 1999; Brouwer et al., 1999; Carson et al., 1996; Desvousges et al., 1992; Downing and Ozuna, 1996; Johnstone and…”
- An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands (2007, background): “…reflected the total economic value of those services, competing uses may have higher market 8 For assessments of the performance and potential of benefit transfers and applications, see Brouwer (2000), Smith et al. (2002), Bergstrom and De Civita (1999), and Rosenberger and Loomis (2001). values.”
- Benefit Transfer in Europe: How Reliable Are Transfers between Countries? (2004, result): “This result contrast those of Brouwer and Spaninks (1999), who found that value function transfer outperformed unit value transfer, though they limited their comparison to cases where value functions were not statistically different.”
- How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers? (2008, unknown): “5 The benefit transfer function from a single study is often specified as WTPi=a + bXij +cYik + ei, where WTPi is willingness-to-pay of respondent i, X site/good characteristics (j), Y respondent characteristics (k), ej random error, and the number of observations is equal to the number of responden”
- The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation (2015, background): “Brouwer (2000), for ex-”
- The Economic Value of Wetland Conservation and Creation: A Meta-Analysis (2008, unknown): “Environmental valuation studies carried out at different geographical sites and involving populations with different socio-economic characteristics and consumer preferences typically produce different outcomes (Brouwer, 2000).”