Lay Theories of Essentialism
By S. Demoulin, J. Leyens, V. Yzerbyt. 2006
99 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/abfc6dd57c9c4b2c66b33031764e89016a079763
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Ying-yi Hong
- Chi-Yue Chiu
- Sheri R. Levy
- Susan A. Gelman
- Andrew P. Smiler
- Verónica Benet‐Martínez
- Michael W. Morris
- M. Verkuyten
In Sociology and Political Science
- Ying-yi Hong
- Chi-Yue Chiu
- Sheri R. Levy
- Susan A. Gelman
- Andrew P. Smiler
- Carol S. Dweck
- Melanie Killen
- Vivienne Y. K. Tao
Citations in the corpus
- Lay Theories and Intergroup Relations (2006, methodology): “However, when essentialism is defined more broadly, entitativity and natural kinds tend to be considered subcomponents of essentialism (e.g. Demoulin et al., 2006; Haslam et al. 2000).”
- Determinants of Gender Essentialism in College Students (2008, background): “Demoulin et al. (2006) note that essentialism influences prejudice, perceived differences between groups, dispositional attributions, and justifying social inequalities.”