ESTIMATION OF OCELOT DENSITY IN THE PANTANAL USING CAPTURE–RECAPTURE ANALYSIS OF CAMERA-TRAPPING DATA
300 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/abfa8dd8f1ff39d56276bfed2fc7d2c7300824e5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- M. Kelly
- Agustín Paviolo
- M. D. Di Bitetti
- C. De Angelo
- J. Andrew Royle
- A. Noss
- Beth Gardner
- Y. D. Di Blanco
In Social Psychology
- M. Kelly
- Agustín Paviolo
- C. De Angelo
- A. Noss
- M. D. Di Bitetti
- Adam Dillon
- L. Maffei
- Y. D. Di Blanco
Citations in the corpus
- Density, habitat use and activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentina (2006, background): “Recently, Trolle & Kéry (2003, 2005) and Maffei et al. (2005) used camera traps to estimate ocelot densities in the Brazilian Pantanal and the Bolivian dry forests, respectively.”
- Is camera-trapping an efficient method for surveying mammals in Neotropical forests? A case study in south-eastern Brazil (2005, background): “This is not different in Brazil, where few studies have been published (Marques & Ramos 2001, Santos-Filho & Silva 2002, Silveira et al. 2003, Trolle 2003, Trolle & Kéry 2003).”
- Jaguar Panthera onca population decline in the Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest of Argentina and Brazil (2008, methodology): “However, in some situations using ½ MMDM as the buffer could inflate density estimates (Trolle & Kéry, 2003; Soisalo & Cavalcanti, 2006; Maffei & Noss, 2007) and, if radiotelemetry data exist, the best buffer should be the radius of the estimate of mean home range (Soisalo & Cavalcanti, 2006).”
- A comparison of the effectiveness of camera trapping and live trapping for sampling terrestrial small-mammal communities (2010, background): “Camera units arenearly alwaysmountedonvertical structures, such as large trees, to capture profile photographs of passing animals (e.g. Sweitzer et al. 2000; O’Brien et al. 2003; Trolle and Kery 2003).”
- Comparison of noninvasive genetic and camera-trapping techniques for surveying snow leopards (2011, background): “Ocelots numbered ,10 in 3 published camera-trap studies (Haines et al. 2006; Maffei and Noss 2008; Trolle and Kery 2003).”
- Estimating Puma Densities from Camera Trapping across Three Study Sites: Bolivia, Argentina, and Belize (2008, background): “…by guest on 30 O ctober 2018 2003; Maffei et al. 2004; Silver et al. 2004; Wallace et al. 2003), ocelots (Leopardus pardalis—Di Bitetti et al. 2006; Dillon and Kelly 2007; Maffei et al. 2005; Trolle and Kery 2003), and Geoffroy’s cats (Leopardus geoffroyi—Cuéllar et al. 2006).”
- Design, evaluate, refine: camera trap studies for elusive species (2008, methodology): “For example, even when targeting the same species, the amount of effort (i.e. trap nights or camera days) can vary widely from 450 trap nights (Trolle & Kéry, 2003) to 2280 (Maffei et al., 2005) for a single survey.”
- How Small is too Small? Camera Trap Survey Areas and Density Estimates for Ocelots in the Bolivian Chaco (2007, methodology): “…new methods, namely systematic camera-trapping surveys, to estimate population density and to describe activity patterns, habitat use, and ranging behavior (Maffei et al. 2002, 2005; Trolle & Kéry 2003, 2005; Dillon 2005; Di Bitetti et al. 2006; Haines et al. 2006; Dillon & Kelly, in press).”
- Ocelot (Felis pardalis) population densities, activity, and ranging behaviour in the dry forests of eastern Bolivia: data from camera trapping (2005, methodology): “Individual ocelots are relatively easy to distinguish, using black-and-white images, based on rosette and stripe patterns (see also Trolle & Kéry 2003).”
- Camera-trap studies of maned wolf density in the Cerrado and the Pantanal of Brazil (2007, methodology): “The methodology outlined in Trolle and Kéry (2003) was followed.”
- Evaluating capture–recapture population and density estimation of tigers in a population with known parameters (2010, background): “Journal compilation c 2009 The Zoological Society of London94 variation o10% (e.g. see Karanth, 1995; Trolle & Kéry, 2003; Karanth et al., 2004; Silver et al., 2004; Soisalo & Cavalcanti, 2006; Wang & Macdonald, 2009).”
- An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large‐ and medium‐sized terrestrial rainforest mammals (2008, unknown): “…Srbek-Araujo & Garcia, 2005; Azlan & Lading, 2006) to studying activity patterns (van Schaik & Griffiths, 1996; Gómez et al., 2005; Azlan & Sharma, 2006) and estimating animal density (Mace et al., 1994; Karanth & Nichols, 1998; Sweitzer et al., 2000; Trolle & Kéry, 2003; Silver et al., 2004).”
- Is research effort allocated efficiently for conservation? Felidae as a global case study (2009, background): “Recent research on tigers (Karanth and Nichols 1998, 2002; Karanth et al. 2004a), the seventh most studied felid, has generated innovative monitoring techniques that are increasingly being applied to other species ( Trolle and Kery 2003; Silver et al. 2004; Jackson et al. 2006; Salom-Perez et al. 2”
- Density and activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in northern Peru and the impact of oil exploration activities (2010, methodology): “…cats) in MMDM calculations, assigning them a MDM of zero (e.g., Dillon and Kelly, 2007; Silver et al., 2004), whereas most others include only individuals captured at least at two different stations (e.g. Di Bitetti et al., 2006; Maffei et al., 2005; Trolle and Kery, 2003) as we have done here.”