Comparison of noninvasive genetic and camera-trapping techniques for surveying snow leopards

By J. Janecka, B. Munkhtsog, R. Jackson, Galsandorj Naranbaatar, David P. Mallon, W. Murphy. 2011

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7bf13a7e4895dc8a884404a24578cc0f17e422b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. S. Hamel
2. N. Yoccoz
3. R. Ims
4. A. Mysterud
5. T. O'Brien
6. M. Kinnaird
7. Mevin B. Hooten
8. T. Hefley

In Genetics

1. N. Yoccoz
2. A. Mysterud

In Small Animals

1. S. Hamel
2. N. Yoccoz

Citations in the corpus

• Towards good practice guidance in using camera‐traps in ecology: influence of sampling design on validity of ecological inferences (2013, background): “Many compared camera-traps with other sampling methods (Silveira, Jacomo &Diniz-Filho 2003; Rovero &Marshall 2009; De Bondi et al. 2010; Janecka et al. 2011), whereas others focused on comparing different camera types and their efficiency in trapping animals (Kelly & Holub 2008; Swann, Kawanishi & P”