Jaguar Panthera onca population decline in the Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest of Argentina and Brazil
By Agustín Paviolo, C. De Angelo, Y. D. Di Blanco, M. D. Di Bitetti. Oryx, 2008
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Small Animals
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd420acda85940d19c2d3970314ffc40ab933126
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Mathias Tobler
- G. Powell
- Y. D. Di Blanco
- Agustín Paviolo
- M. D. Di Bitetti
- B. Harmsen
- C. De Angelo
- R. Foster
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Agustín Paviolo
- C. De Angelo
- R. Foster
- B. Harmsen
- Y. D. Di Blanco
- M. D. Di Bitetti
- I. Pérez
- J. Pereira
In Small Animals
- M. D. Di Bitetti
- Agustín Paviolo
- Y. D. Di Blanco
- R. Foster
- B. Harmsen
- C. De Angelo
- Mathias Tobler
- G. Powell
Citations in the corpus
- Niche partitioning and species coexistence in a Neotropical felid assemblage. (2010, methodology): “…as a result of poaching has been well documented in the area (Cullen et al., 2000, 2001; Di Bitetti et al., 2008b; Paviolo et al., 2009a) and this may be an important factor that negatively affects jaguar and puma abundances in the less protected sites (Azevedo, 2008; Paviolo et al., 2008, 2009b).”
- Differential impact of landscape transformation on pumas (Puma concolor) and jaguars (Panthera onca) in the Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest (2011, background): “For example, in the UPAF, not only urgent actions are needed for reducing local threats on jaguars (Paviolo et al., 2008), but also regional scale measures are necessary to increase the amount and connectivity of suitable habitats, mainly through habitat protection and forest restoration (Table 2).”
- A critique of density estimation from camera-trap data† (2012, methodology): “…methods of assessing relative abundance such as sign surveys for comparison Foster and Harmsen Density Estimation From Camera-Trap Data 227 with the photographic capture rates (e.g., Paviolo et al. 2008), or by increasing trap effort (trap density and sampling duration; see Wegge et al. 2004).”
- Estimating jaguar densities with camera traps: Problems with current designs and recommendations for future studies (2013, unknown): “7 958 1.46±0.34 0.93±0.2a (Paviolo et al. 2008) Argentina Urugua-i 34 45 1.25 81 1 - 11.33±2.”
- High jaguar densities and large population sizes in the core habitat of the southwestern Amazon (2013, background): “The same concern of human impact is likely to be relevant for the Iguazu moist forest of northern Argentina which had a density of only 0.49– 0.93 jaguars 100 km 2 (Paviolo et al., 2008).”
- Time Partitioning Favors the Coexistence of Sympatric Crab-Eating Foxes (Cerdocyon thous) and Pampas Foxes (Lycalopex gymnocercus) (2009, methodology): “For details on the methodology used during these surveys see Di Bitetti et al. (2008) and Paviolo et al. (2008).”
- Improving density estimates for elusive carnivores: Accounting for sex-specific detection and movements using spatial capture–recapture models for jaguars in central Brazil (2011, methodology): “The issue of underestimating animal movement is important and applies to virtually all camera trapping surveys which usually sample much smaller areas than the present study, and even for jaguars are limited to areas ranging from 90 (Salom-Pérez et al., 2007) to 550 km2 (Paviolo et al., 2008).”