Ocelot (Felis pardalis) population densities, activity, and ranging behaviour in the dry forests of eastern Bolivia: data from camera trapping
By L. Maffei, A. Noss, E. Cuéllar, D. Rumiz. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 2005
159 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bf2b564339c1b6c8a9875a94eab00350920080b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- M. Kelly
- Agustín Paviolo
- B. Harmsen
- R. Foster
- M. D. Di Bitetti
- C. De Angelo
- Y. D. Di Blanco
- J. Kolowski
In Genetics
- M. Kelly
- C. De Angelo
- Agustín Paviolo
- M. D. Di Bitetti
- Y. D. Di Blanco
- J. Kolowski
- Alfonso Alonso
- A. Noss
In Social Psychology
- M. Kelly
- Agustín Paviolo
- C. De Angelo
- M. D. Di Bitetti
- Y. D. Di Blanco
- Adam Dillon
- B. Harmsen
- R. Foster
Citations in the corpus
- Comparison of density estimation methods for mammal populations with camera traps in the Kaa‐Iya del Gran Chaco landscape (2012, background): “…studied in South America alone [e.g. puma Puma concolor (Kelly et al., 2008; Paviolo et al., 2009), ocelot Leopardus pardalis (Trolle & Kéry, 2003; Maffei et al., 2005; di Bitetti, Paviolo & de Angelo, 2006; Dillon & Kelly, 2007, 2008; Maffei & Noss, 2008), Pampas cat Leopardus colocolo (Gardner…”
- Camera trapping photographic rate as an index of density in forest ungulates (2009, unknown): “2004) and ocelot Leopardus pardalisLinnaeus (Maffei et al. 2004).”
- Design, evaluate, refine: camera trap studies for elusive species (2008, background): “For example, even when targeting the same species, the amount of effort (i.e. trap nights or camera days) can vary widely from 450 trap nights (Trolle & Kéry, 2003) to 2280 (Maffei et al., 2005) for a single survey.”
- Spatial and Temporal Interactions of Sympatric Jaguars (Panthera onca) and Pumas (Puma concolor) in a Neotropical Forest (2009, methodology): “Camera traps have previously been used mainly for studies of dynamics at the population level (Maffei et al. 2005; Noss et al. 2006).”
- A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research (2017, methodology): “CTs have also been used in behavioural studies (Maffei et al. 2005; Bridges and Noss 2011).”
- Density, habitat use and activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentina (2006, methodology): “The difference between the female-biased sex ratio of our study population and the more even (or male biased) sex ratio reported byMaffei et al. (2005) for the ocelot populations of the dry forests of Bolivia is suggestive of differences in the social system of ocelots between sites.”
- Carnivore co‐existence and habitat use in the Mountain Pine Ridge Forest Reserve, Belize (2011, methodology): “We used standardized techniques for remote camera surveys found to be successful in trapping neotropical felids (Silver et al., 2004; Maffei et al., 2005; Kelly et al., 2008).”
- Density and activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in northern Peru and the impact of oil exploration activities (2010, methodology): “…cats) in MMDM calculations, assigning them a MDM of zero (e.g., Dillon and Kelly, 2007; Silver et al., 2004), whereas most others include only individuals captured at least at two different stations (e.g. Di Bitetti et al., 2006; Maffei et al., 2005; Trolle and Kery, 2003) as we have done here.”
- Estimating Puma Densities from Camera Trapping across Three Study Sites: Bolivia, Argentina, and Belize (2008, methodology): “…by guest on 30 O ctober 2018 2003; Maffei et al. 2004; Silver et al. 2004; Wallace et al. 2003), ocelots (Leopardus pardalis—Di Bitetti et al. 2006; Dillon and Kelly 2007; Maffei et al. 2005; Trolle and Kery 2003), and Geoffroy’s cats (Leopardus geoffroyi—Cuéllar et al. 2006).”
- How Small is too Small? Camera Trap Survey Areas and Density Estimates for Ocelots in the Bolivian Chaco (2007, methodology): “This paper reports the first such comparative study on ocelots in tropical dry forests within the Kaa-Iya del Gran Chaco National Park, an unexpected stronghold for the species (Maffei et al. 2005).”
- Predicting potential distribution of the jaguar (Panthera onca) in Mexico: identification of priority areas for conservation (2011, background): “, 2002) and of 65 km(2) for males (Maffei et al., 2005) and (3) a complete overlap of the home range of one male with two females (Scognamillo et al.”
- Ocelot Leopardus pardalis in Belize: the impact of trap spacing and distance moved on density estimates (2007, background): “…the density of tigers (Karanth, 1995; Karanth & Nichols, 1998; Karanth et al., 2004), jaguars (Kelly, 2003; Maffei et al., 2004; Silver et al., 2004; Soisalo & Cavalcanti, 2006) and, more recently, ocelots (Trolle & Kery, 2003; Maffei et al., 2005; Di Bitetti et al., 2006; Haines et al., 2006).”
- Ocelot home range, overlap and density: comparing radio telemetry with camera trapping (2008, background): “…jaguars Panthera onca Kelly, 2003; Maffei, Cuellar & Noss, 2004; Silver et al., 2004; pumas Puma concolor Kelly et al., 2008; ocelots L. pardalis Maffei et al., 2005; DiBitetti, Paviolo & DeAngelo, 2006; Dillon & Kelly, 2007; bobcats Lynx rufus Heilbrun et al., 2006; Kelly & Holub, 2008;…”