STRUCTURAL ENCODING AND IDENTIFICATION IN FACE PROCESSING: ERP EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE MECHANISMS

By S. Bentin, Leon Y. Deouell. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2000

671 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab1ffeabbe6a981f5635fc2ae509481510e07269

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170 (2008, neutral): “Holmes et al., 2003; long-term familiarity ,e .g. Bentin and Deouell, 2000; task diagnosticity, e.g.”
Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity (2006, background): “ERP differences between familiar and unfamiliar faces have also been reported at a later time of about 400 msec poststimulus onset (Bentin & Deouell, 2000; Eimer, 2000; Paller, Gonsalves, Grabowecky, Bozic, & Yamada, 2000).”
Understanding the Nature of Face Processing Impairment in Autism: Insights From Behavioral and Electrophysiological Studies (2005, background): “One hypothesis suggests that it reflects eye detection because the N170 shows the greatest amplitude and shortest latency in response to eyes (Bentin et al., 1996; Taylor et al., 1999, 2001).”
Affective Judgments of Faces Modulate Early Activity (∼160 ms) within the Fusiform Gyri (2002, background): “As the N170 was found to be unaffected by face familiarity, it seems to be associated with precategorial structural encoding of faces rather than with later processes involved in face recognition or identification (Bentin and Deouell, 2000; Bentin et al., 1996; Eimer, 2000).”
Three Stages of Facial Expression Processing: ERP Study with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (2009, background): “This component clearly distinguishes faces from non-face visual stimuli and is therefore considered to be an index of the configural processing of the face (Bentin et al., 1996; Rossion et al., 1999; Bentin and Deouell, 2000; Rossion et al., 2003; Itier and Taylor, 2004).”
Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. (2000, background): “Notably, no effect of familiarity on the N170 component was found in this study, which led Bentin and Deouell (2000) to conclude that this component re¯ects perceptual stages of structural analysis that are not in¯uenced by face identi®cation processes.”
Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. (2007, positive): “…or stimlus repetition, but later responses (between 200 and 500 ms), ecorded in parietal and frontal locations, are sensitive to familarity (Bentin & Deouell, 2000; Eimer, 2000; Henson et al., 003; Paller, Hutson, Miller, & Boehm, 2003; Schweinberger, ickering, Burton, & Kaufmann, 2002).”
Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms. (2002, background): “This response at 170 ms is not influenced by the familiarity of the face (Bentin et al., 1996; Bentin & Deouell, 2000; Eimer, 2000a), thus presumably corresponding to bottom-up aspects of perceptual processing (akin to early structural encoding in the model by Bruce & Young, 1986).”
Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs (2002, background): “Hence, N170, which seems unaffected either by familiarity (Bentin and Deouell, 2000; Eimer, 2000a) or by directed attention (Séverac-Cauquil et al., 2000), is likely to reflect face encoding processes, especially the stages where representations of global face configurations are generated (Eimer,…”
Familiarity matters: A review on prioritized processing of personally familiar faces (2018, background): “…are decreased for unfamiliar faces, compared to different types of familiar faces (famous, personally familiar, and experimentally learned faces; Bentin & Deouell, 2000; Caharel, Courtay, Bernard, Lalonde, & Rebai, 2005, 2006; Eimer, 2000; Herzmann et al., 2004; Paller, Gonsalves, Grabowecky,…”