Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170

594 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ageing faces in ageing minds: A review on the own-age bias in face recognition (2013, background): “Early perceptual face processing stages are reflected in the so-called N170, an ERP component with a negative peak approximately 170 ms after stimulus onset, which is larger for face relative to object stimuli (e.g., Bentin, Allison, Puce, Perez, & McCarthy, 1996; Rossion & Jacques, 2008).”
Action intentions modulate visual processing during action perception. (2011, methodology): “These electrode selections were based on previous studies investigating visual processing of hands and faces (Kovacs et al., 2006; Letourneau & Mitchell, 2008; Rossion & Jacques, 2008).”
From Mind Perception to Mental Connection: Synchrony as a Mechanism for Social Understanding (2012, background): “This response is evoked by faces of all shapes and sizes, including schematic line drawings (Bentin et al., 1996; Gauthier et al., 2003; Rossion & Jacques, 2008; Watanabe et al., 2003).”
The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception (2013, unknown): “In particular, we targeted the N170 ERP component, a large electrophysiological response peaking at about 170 ms following stimulus onset over occipitotemporal sites (Bentin, Allison, Puce, Perez, & McCarthy, 1996; see, for reviews, Rossion & Jacques, 2008, 2011).”